+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 72

Thread: Anti-armor weapons of the japanese infantry.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,554

    Default Anti-armor weapons of the japanese infantry.

    Kawamura Type 97 cal. 20 mm



    The desing of this heavy antitank rifle belong to the ing. Masawa Kawamura who start the development in 1935.

    For 1937 the desing was completed and the weapon was officially adopted for the army in 1937 ( some were bought for the Navy also). The working mechanism of this rifle is semiautomatic with an roting bolt wich is gas operated. The loading is made from the top (bren like) and in accept an 7 shot magazine.

    The weight is about 55 kg , in order to carry it quickly 2 handlebars resembleming a bike could be atached in the front and the rear pad. For aditional protection in the shooting and 4 mm steel shield can be added, in this case the weight climbs to 66 kg.

    The weapon is very powerful, it shoots a 20mm ( 20 mm round x125mm case) specially designed cartrigde, the muzzle velocity is about 815 m/s and is stated that it could penetrated the light M-3 stuart from 150 meters away.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ruhr Area, Germany
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Hi.

    Some additions:

    The typ 97 20 mm automatic gun (original designation) was a side development of the type 98 20 mm aa-gun using the same muzzle break and other design parts. The total weight was 55 kg, 72,5 kg with handles. The shield wasn´t used often to increase mobility.

    In 1943 the rifle was reworked to spare raw materials lowering the weight with handles to 59 kg.



    The crew of one rifle was 4 men, gunner, loader, 2 ammunition carrier. A sqad consisted of two rifle teams, 1 squad leader (NCO) and 1 runner.

    During transport the rifle was disassembled in two parts and carried by three horses with 150 shots. With cavalry units the rifle was loaded on 2 horses with 105 shots to increase mobility.



    The type 97 ap-round wit a muzzle velocity of 865 m/sec could penetrate 30 mm/90° on 350 m and 20 mm/90° on 700 m. Additionally the type 98 20X141 mm he-round could be fired against soft targets like field fortifications etc. The main charge was HMX and Nitropenta. Maximum range with the type 98 round was 4000 m.



    Yours

    tom!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    5,132

    Default

    Great info here. I'm wondering about the production totals and of how common these weapons were. My guess is that they were fairly rare.



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ruhr Area, Germany
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Hi.

    Type 94 37 mm rapid fire infantry gun:



    This gun was planned from 1933 on as replacement for the type Taisho 11 37 mm infantry gun. It should be used as infantry gun and anti-tank gun. Other specifications were low weight for easy handling, an armour shield and transport with a light towing vehicle or 4 horses.

    The first prototypes were built in 1934 with rubber tires for high transport speed. During tests the tires were found very vulnerable for small arms fire so they were replaced by wodden or metal wheels with rubber band.

    The gun worked semi-automatic making a maximum rof of 20 rpm possible, 15 rpm cyclic. The total weight was 327 kg. This was found acceptable. The 4 mm thick shield was often removed to spare the weight making the gun more mobile. Two hande bars could be attached on the lafette for man transport.



    In 1936 the gun was first used in China. The 0,49 kg type 95 he-round was found useful against soft targets on ranges up to 5000 m. Due to the lack of armoured vehicles in the chinese forces the ap-abilities were not necessaryly needed.

    Shooting range tests showed a problem with the early ap-round lowering the penetration ability to 20 mm/90° 350 m. In the mid-thirties additional research was made on this problem leading to a new projectile introduced around 1937 giving the gun a penetration ability of 40mm/90° on 300 mm and 25 mm/90° on 900 m.

    The type 94 gun was also used in a modified version as type 95 37 mm tank gun on the type 95 light tank Ha-Go and the type 94 tk special tractors and the early type 97 tankettes Te-Ke.



    The Nomonham Incident showed the inefficiency against modern medium tanks as used by the Soviets. The high rof made the gun very useful against light ands medium field fortifications but due to the small caliber almost useless against heavyly fortified or concrete targets.

    As the road transport speed was limited due to the wheels used a special transport carrier was developed in the late 1930´s. The gun was fixed on this carriage and then a road speed of up to 52 kph instead of 25 kph was possible.



    A gun section with the type 94 rapid-fire infantry gun consisted of 11 men, leader, gunner 1 (giving direction), gunner 2 (directing gun), 2 loaders, 6 ammunition soldiers, also for close defence, and 1 driver. A gun platoon was two gun sections, section commander, 2 runners.

    A Battalion anti-tank/infanry gun company consisted of two gun sections, company headquater ( Commander, 7 runners and orderlies, 1 NCO personnel administration, 1 NCO supply, 1 NCO arms and equipment, 2 medics), Ammunition platoon (commander, 20 NCO´s and men) and observation section (1 NCO, 6 men).

    Yours

    tom!
    Last edited by tom!; 10-22-2006 at 06:55 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ruhr Area, Germany
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Hi.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nickdfresh View Post
    Great info here. I'm wondering about the production totals and of how common these weapons were. My guess is that they were fairly rare.
    Some 400 were made. The japanese army realised early that the rifle wasn´t very efective compared to the relatively high weight. Nevertheless the production was never cancelled totally.

    Yours

    tom!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,554

    Default

    Very good info and pictures Tom, only a thing...

    The type 97 ap-round wit a muzzle velocity of 865 m/sec could penetrate 30 mm/90° on 350 m and 20 mm/90° on 700 m. Additionally the type 98 20X141 mm he-round could be fired against soft targets like field fortifications etc
    .

    The cartrigde used by the Type 97 wasnt 20x141 mm but 20x125 mm.

    Ap shot.




    The larger 20x141 round belong to the Army AA cannon type 98.




    And this is a Type 97 captured by the russians, it had the handlebars but no shield.
    Last edited by Panzerknacker; 07-06-2008 at 11:17 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ruhr Area, Germany
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Hi.

    The 20X141 mm was the type 98 he-round.... hm.

    Maybe the author meant the projectile of the type 98 he-round of the aa-gun, used with a 125mm cartridge. That would make more sense to me.



    Yours

    tom!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,554

    Default

    Is probably that, because the cartrigde cases were NOT interchangeable.

    -------------

    Lunge Hollow Charge:

    This was a semi-suicide weapon ( not intended as it but the close blast and fragmentation effect made it in that way)
    A hollow charge mine was attached at the edge of the pole. Gripping the pole, stab it against tank and the mine is exploded.

    [IMG]http://www3.plala.or.jp/takihome/*****-mine.JPG[/IMG]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ruhr Area, Germany
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Hi.

    From the US TM 9-1985-4:



    I renamed it with german designations.

    from top:
    - wooden handle
    - safety pin
    - shear wire
    - connection cylinder
    - striker
    - threaded connecting ring
    - detonator
    - steel case
    - explosive filling
    - steel cone
    - bottom plate
    - legs

    pull out safety pin, struck it against target, shear wire breaks, detonation

    penetration: 130 mm


    A similar construction with more chances to survive the explosion but only for lightly armoured vehicles and soft targets:

    Suction-cup mine:

    same source



    from top:
    - pull igniters
    - safety fuze
    - blasting cap
    - connecting sleeve
    - primacord
    - handle
    - charge container
    - cast explosive
    - blasting cap
    - suction cup

    total length: 1800 mm
    charge container: 135 mm X diameter 112,5 mm
    charge weight: 2010 g
    charge type: 53 % RDX, 47 % TNT

    Two delay elements/primacords are used parallel to make sure the explosion happens.

    suck mine against target, pull friction igniters, safety fuze delay time 10-15 sec, upper blasting caps detonate igniting primacord, lower blasting caps ignite explosive

    edit:
    Some of these devices were used during the December 1944 airbourne operations against US airstrips on Leyte and the Philippines

    Yours

    tom!
    Last edited by tom!; 10-28-2006 at 03:28 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,554

    Default

    Intreresting this last one, I dont have any knowlegde of it, seems to be a "blast effect only" weapon, rather similar to the german Geballte ladung or the russian RPG-40. ¿ wich was their japanese designation?


    More info I ve found in www.lonesentry.com.


    LUNGE MINE

    Perhaps the oddest of these antitank charges is the so-called "Lunge Mine" encountered on Leyte Island. This weapon—an armor-piercing charge on the end of a pole—derives its name from the way in which it must be thrust against the side of a tank in order to detonate.
    The mine is an explosive-filled, sheet-steel cone, about 12 inches long and 8 inches in diameter at the base. As in all hollow charges, the cavity in the bottom of the cone tends to guide the force of the explosion out from the bottom of the cone and against the armor plate of the target. A metal sleeve extends from the top, or point end, of the cone and houses the simple firing device—a nail on the end of the broomstick-like handle which fits into the sleeve. The detonator is little more than an ordinary blasting cap set into the top of the cone, where the nail will strike the cap if the handle is jammed down in the sleeve. During transport, however, the handle is held immobile in the sleeve by a simple safety pin inserted through the sleeve and handle. A further safety feature is a thin holding pin, or shear wire, similarly installed through sleeve and handle. Three legs, 5 1/4 inches long, are attached to the bottom of the cone; the Japanese claim that these legs increase the penetrating power of the weapon. The penetrating effect of the charge is greater when the explosion occurs a few inches away from the armor.
    The Japanese suicide soldier will use the Lunge Mine as he would a rifle and bayonet, thrusting the three legs of the mine base against the side of the tank. The mine explodes on contact.


    The Japanese suicide soldier has been taught to wield this weapon as he would a rifle and bayonet. The prescribed method of operation is for the soldier to remove the safety pin as he approaches the tank to be attacked, and to grasp the center of the handle with his left hand, and the butt end with his right. Then, holding the stick level, with the mine to the front, he lunges forward as in a bayonet attack, thrusting the three legs on the mine base against the side of the tank. The shock of contact will break the shear wire and the striker nail will be shoved into the detonator cap, thus exploding the mine as it is held against the armor. At this point the Jap soldier's mission ends for all time.
    From experiments conducted in Manila, the Japanese claim that the 6 1/2 pounds of explosive in the mine is capable of penetrating 6 inches of armor, provided that the mine contacts the plate squarely. However, if contact is made at an angle of 60 degrees, the mine is reputed to penetrate 4 inches of armor. To date all attempts by the enemy to use the Lunge Mine against our tanks have met with failure.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicago ILL
    Posts
    459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Panzerknacker View Post
    Intreresting this last one, I dont have any knowlegde of it, seems to be a "blast effect only" weapon, rather similar to the german Geballte ladung or the russian RPG-40. ¿ wich was their japanese designation?


    More info I ve found in www.lonesentry.com.


    LUNGE MINE

    Perhaps the oddest of these antitank charges is the so-called "Lunge Mine" encountered on Leyte Island. This weapon—an armor-piercing charge on the end of a pole—derives its name from the way in which it must be thrust against the side of a tank in order to detonate.
    The mine is an explosive-filled, sheet-steel cone, about 12 inches long and 8 inches in diameter at the base. As in all hollow charges, the cavity in the bottom of the cone tends to guide the force of the explosion out from the bottom of the cone and against the armor plate of the target. A metal sleeve extends from the top, or point end, of the cone and houses the simple firing device—a nail on the end of the broomstick-like handle which fits into the sleeve. The detonator is little more than an ordinary blasting cap set into the top of the cone, where the nail will strike the cap if the handle is jammed down in the sleeve. During transport, however, the handle is held immobile in the sleeve by a simple safety pin inserted through the sleeve and handle. A further safety feature is a thin holding pin, or shear wire, similarly installed through sleeve and handle. Three legs, 5 1/4 inches long, are attached to the bottom of the cone; the Japanese claim that these legs increase the penetrating power of the weapon. The penetrating effect of the charge is greater when the explosion occurs a few inches away from the armor.
    The Japanese suicide soldier will use the Lunge Mine as he would a rifle and bayonet, thrusting the three legs of the mine base against the side of the tank. The mine explodes on contact.


    The Japanese suicide soldier has been taught to wield this weapon as he would a rifle and bayonet. The prescribed method of operation is for the soldier to remove the safety pin as he approaches the tank to be attacked, and to grasp the center of the handle with his left hand, and the butt end with his right. Then, holding the stick level, with the mine to the front, he lunges forward as in a bayonet attack, thrusting the three legs on the mine base against the side of the tank. The shock of contact will break the shear wire and the striker nail will be shoved into the detonator cap, thus exploding the mine as it is held against the armor. At this point the Jap soldier's mission ends for all time.
    From experiments conducted in Manila, the Japanese claim that the 6 1/2 pounds of explosive in the mine is capable of penetrating 6 inches of armor, provided that the mine contacts the plate squarely. However, if contact is made at an angle of 60 degrees, the mine is reputed to penetrate 4 inches of armor. To date all attempts by the enemy to use the Lunge Mine against our tanks have met with failure.

    I seem to recall the japs using this weapon in MOH Rising Sun.



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,554

    Default

    Type 99 AT Mine

    This AT mine was thrown to the tank, or attached by its magnets. Four black boxes around the mine are magnets. One Type 99 AT Mine could destroy a 20 mm thick armor and two piled mines could destroy a 30 mm thick armor. Similar in use as the german hafthohlladung but without the benefit of the shaped charge.




    Size : 120 mm (diameter) x 38 mm (thickness) Weight : 1.25 kg Explosive : TNT 680 g

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ruhr Area, Germany
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Hi.



    from top left:
    - safety pin
    - compression spring
    - percussion cap
    - Locking balls
    - delay pellet
    - striker
    - detonator
    - explosive
    - canvas cover
    - magnets


    Description:

    The mine resembles a canvas cloth bag, disk shaped, with a snap-fastened flap on the outer edge for inserting the eight blocks of explosive (cast mixture of 50-50 RDX-TNT). Opposite the filling flap on the outer edge of the mine is a metal adaper which is externally threaded to receive the fuze. Four equally spaced permanent magnets are attached by khaki webbing to the outer edge of the mine body.

    The mine is packed two to a wooden box complete with wooden shipping plugs in in the fuze adapters. The fuzes are enclosed in tubular metal cases sealed with a paper band and tear string. For carrying on the field, the mines are packed individually ina khaki-colored cloth pouch.



    The fuze contains two springs, a compresion spring and a firing pin spring, the latter of which is contained in a firing pin sleve. Four steel retaining balls fit into holes in the firing pin sleve and notches in the firing pin, retaining the position of the firing pin.
    A fuze cap provides a base for the first spring and is grooved on the inside about one-third of the way up from its base.
    There is a safety pin which passes through the fuze body just below the base of the safety cap and between the striker and the percussion cap.
    The powder relay train threads into the base of the fuze body, and the detonator tube threads over the base of the delay train container.

    Operation:
    The fuze is carried separately and is secured to the mine by a locking ring. In use the safety pin is pulled, the fuze cap given a sharp rap, and the mine either placed on or tossed on armour plate within a range of ten feet.
    When the fuze cap is forced downward against the compression spring, its groove aligns with the retaining balls. The tension of the firing pin spring forces the retaining balls into this groove and also forces the striker down onto the percussion cap.

    Test detonations of this mine indicate a distinct "Munroe-Effect" at the junction of the inner edges of the explosive blocks.



    There were some tests with a similar mine type with ring-mounted explosive filing leaving a central hole increasing the Munroe-Effect. The magnets were placed on the canvas cover not on the edges of the mine. Development was ceased in 1941 as the penetration was only 35 mm.

    Yours

    tom!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,554

    Default

    Very nice, you always seems to have very good pictures of this devices, thanks.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ruhr Area, Germany
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Hi.

    I´m studying the japanese military of ww2 for 4 years now and I digged out some very interesting facts and especially pics.

    Type Ra 37 mm at-gun:

    From 1936 on the japanese army captured a number of german 3,7 cm Pak Rheinmetall (official designation, 35 or 35/36 is a post-war addition) in China and in various border incidents between Manshuria and Mongolia/Soviet Union. As this gun was far superiour to the japanese guns and with a relatively low weight the gun was introduced officially.



    The guns were equipped with japanese optics. To increase mobility a small guidance wheel could be attached to the trails. Additionally the gun shield (120 kg) was often removed by the troops to lower the weight.



    The ammunition was copied from the rounds captured and had a similar effect.

    The gun was used in China and also on Guadalcanal and replaced the type 94 rapid-fire infantry gun in regimental at-companies.


    type 1 37 mm at-gun:



    After capturing the type Ra at-guns the type 94 rapid-fire infantry gun was reworked using design elements of the captured guns. In a first step the chamber volume was increased to increase the propellant weight and thus to increase the muzzle velocity. The tests showed an increase in penetration but the total penetration ability was still unsatisfactorily and due to the heavier recoil an enlarged recoil mechanism was necessary increasing the weight of the gun unacceptable.

    Nevertheless the army decided to mount the improved barrel on the mounting of the type 95 37 mm tank gun and introduced it as type 98 37 mm tank gun with a penetration ability of 25 mm/90° on 500 m. This gun was used on type 95 light tank Ha-Go, type 94 tk special tractor, type 97 tankette Te-Ke, type 98 light tank Ke-Ni and type 97 command tank Shi-Ki (mounted in the bow).

    In a side development for the tank troops the chamber walls were strengthened to allow the use of a propellant with higher energy. This gun was named type 100 37 mm tank gun. As the penetration was only increased slightly to 26 mm/90° on 500m only few guns were produced and used on the type 95 light tank Ha-Go and the early type 2 amphibious tank Ka-Mi.

    As the Nomonhan-Incident in 1939 showed the at-abilities of the japanese forces were weak the decision was made to increase the maximum allowed weight for a light at-gun. So the type 100 gun was reworked. The breech was remodelled and the barrel length was extended from L/36,7 to L/45,9 (some sources mentions L/50). This lead to a significant increase of the armour penetration to 44 mm/90° on 500m. On the other hand the weight increase could be limited to 27 kg compared to the type 94 37 mm infantry gun using lighter materials.

    The gun was introduced as type 1 37 mm at-gun in 1941. The total production numer is unknown. It replaced the type 94 37 mm rapid-fire infantry gun in the regimental at-companies.


    type 1 37 mm tank gun and coaxial type 97 7,7 mm tank machine gun in the gun mount used with the type 98 and type 2 light tanks (mounted on a carriage for tests)

    The same barrel was introduced on a slightly reworked mount of the type 100 tank gun as type 1 37 mm tank gun, too, replacing its predecessors. The type 1 37 mm tank gun was used on the type 95 light tank Ha-Go, the type 97 tankette Te-Ke, the type 98 light tank Ke-Ni, the type 2 light tank Ke-To, the type 2 amphibious tank Ka-Mi and on the type 5 tank prototype Chi-Ri (bow-mount).

    Yours

    tom!
    Last edited by tom!; 10-30-2006 at 06:50 AM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts