Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Neutral Countries

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    60

    Default Neutral Countries

    I've been thinking about this for a while and I would like to know what everyone here thinks. War has literally surrounded Switzerland and Sweden. Why is it that these two countires set themselves neutral? In 1940 after France falls why does Hitler not invade Switzerland? She is land locked and cannot recieve any support dirrectly, thus making her an easy target. Lets say the war ends and the Axis win. Will Hitler then take Switzerland? After finishing up Finland why doesn't Stalin just go ahead and invade Sweden? He would link up with his so called ally in Norway. Not to mention valuable materials he will need for his war machine. I know I have a lot of questions on my mind. So does anyone have any idea why they made the decisions they made?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sydney - Down Under
    Posts
    618

    Default

    Existence of Switzerland as neutral country was convenient for both Allies and Germans. Partly due to financial deals, partly because Swiss industry was working for both sides - just to mention Oerlikon.

    And beside that, it is another story to start war with Switzerland and completely different winning this war.
    Swiss had and have even today excellent territorial defence. Every man between 18 to 65 armed. In their terrain it would be like Greece multiplied by 50 or 60.
    Completely hopeless exercise.
    Sweden always based their neutrality on "armed to the teeth principle".
    After soviet experiences in Finland, Germans were careful.
    And major point was that Swedish iron ore was transported to Germany by Swedish ships and Allies could not touch them.
    Anyway both sides needed iron ore.

    Cheers,

    Lancer44

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    63

    Default

    I just like to add that later in the war Switzerland supply much of the ammunition to the Germans, althought I think if the axis would won Hitler will eventually invade and annex Switzerland to the Reich as it's fitted his pan-germanic views.

    Finland was never occupied and she just cut a deal with the Soviets, invading Sweden would be a bad idea for several reasons:

    1. Just like the Finns the Sweds would give uncle Joe a bloody nose.

    2. This was not the time to get sidetrack, Stalin needed to occupy the most part of the Reich he could and more importenly he needed to concolidate it under the banner of Communism.

    3. Again, no sidetrack, Stalin wants to be the first in Berlin for propoganda reasons.

    4. Invading a neutral country would certenly piss his western allies, in that time he actually try to be in good relationship with them, invading Sweden wasn't pary of the plan made between him and his allies to split the Nazi empire.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Koninkrijk der Nederlanden
    Posts
    1,916

    Default

    I'm not sure I've ever seen anything which suggests that the Swiss ever supplied ammunition to the Germans, although I would be delighted to be corrected.
    1884 electric cartridge. Look similar to anything?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bucharest - Romania
    Posts
    3,308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Man of Stoat
    I'm not sure I've ever seen anything which suggests that the Swiss ever supplied ammunition to the Germans, although I would be delighted to be corrected.
    Not quite supplying ammunition but Tony Williams wrote:

    Solothurn in Switzerland, which carried out much interwar development work for Rheinmetall-Borsig of Germany, introduced the self-loading S18-100 series (the numbers of the variants went up to S18-500) in a unique 20 x 105B calibre. This round was later used to develop an aircraft cannon, the Lb 204, although by the time this was adopted for use in German naval aircraft as the MG 204 the case design had been changed slightly to a rimless 20 x 105. The S18-100 series was quite widely used and the rounds are not too difficult to find.


    One cartridge was used by two different ATRs. This was the 20 x 138B 'Long Solothurn' originally designed for a range of Swiss / German developed automatic cannon which saw service in WW2 as the FlaK and KwK 30/38 and the MG C/30L. As a result, the cartridge is the easiest to find of the big ATR rounds. The ATRs in this calibre were the Swiss Solothurn S18-1000/1100 and the Finnish Lahti L/39. The self-loading S18-1000 was a scaled-up version of the earlier S18-100 series. The S18-1100 was similar but automatic in operation; this facility being probably intended for AA use on a special mounting


    http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk/ATRart.htm

    I didn't search for other references as long as I'm waiting Tony to explain.
    Regimentul 38 "Neagoe Basarab"
    Divizia 10 Infanterie


    101st Airborne

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Wilts, England
    Posts
    804

    Default

    Swiss also had just about every bit of infrastructure in the mountains rigged to be demolished should anyone invade. The Swiss military strategy was to retreat and dig in in the mountains. They had and still have many forts/bunkers in the mountains for this purpose. This may have made Hitler more reluctant to take her.



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bucharest - Romania
    Posts
    3,308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dani

    I didn't search for other references as long as I'm waiting Tony to explain.
    In fact I found other interesting fact. A report on 20-mm automatic weapons, from "Tactical and Technical Trends", No. 28, July 1, 1943.
    http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/t...chine-gun.html


    The 20-mm-type automatic gun can be traced back to the German Becker 20-mm gun of 1918. After World War I the patents were sold to a Swiss concern because of treaty limitations on German armament, but in 1928 the Oerlikon Company of Zurich, Switzerland, a German-controlled concern, took over all these patents and turned out the Oerlikon 20-mm gun. The German-controlled Waffenfabrik Solothurn Company of Switzerland shortly thereafter produced the "Solothurn"-type gun. In 1916 the French developed a 37-mm semi-automatic gun for aircraft use. This gun was redesigned during the period from 1920 to 1930 and appeared in the 20-mm series now known as the Hispano-Suiza type.
    At the present time, the following 20-mm weapons or their prototypes exist:
    Name Countries Used By Type of Action and Feed Use
    Solothurn Germany Recoil, magazine AA/AT
    Oerlikon United States, England, Germany, Japan, and others Blowback, magazine Aircraft & AA/AT[...]
    Regimentul 38 "Neagoe Basarab"
    Divizia 10 Infanterie


    101st Airborne

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    60

    Default

    I've also read that the Germans had Swiss bank accounts with lots of gold in them. Could this be another reason they didn't invade?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    under a bush watching you
    Posts
    704

    Default

    Not wishing to split hairs but designing and producing are slightly different. The bren/BESA was of Czech design but produced in UK. The little john tank gun was the same and I think the 6 pdr or some of its ammo was also. I am not sure how the Swiss would export its ammo to the allies as its is land locked by axis countries.
    The \'eathen

    The \'eathen in \'is blindness bows down to wood an\' stone;
    \'E don\'t obey no orders unless they is \'is own;
    \'E keeps \'is side-arms awful: \'e leaves \'em all about,
    An\' then comes up the regiment an\' pokes the \'eathen out.

    Rudyard Kipling

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paramilitary wing of CAMRA
    Posts
    3,331

    Default

    IIRC the Swedes also had their iron ore mines rigged for demolition - or at least the Germans thought they did. As that was a large fraction of their iron ore supplies, they had good reasons not to invade (quite apart from the terrain being rather nasty and the Swedish army rather large).
    Cambridge for scholarship, Oxford for marmalade

Closed Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Dirty Little Secrets of WWII; Neutral Nations Helped the Nazis
    By Nickdfresh in forum 2006 Archive Room
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-21-2006, 03:38 AM
  2. CASUALTIES IN WW2,AND DATA ABOUT COUNTRIES
    By Sturmtruppen in forum 2006 Archive Room
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-03-2006, 03:35 AM
  3. What are the laws in your countries for collecting ?
    By Gutkowski in forum 2005 Archive Room
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-08-2005, 10:46 PM
  4. Leon Degalle's Interview.
    By Hosenfield in forum 2005 Archive Room
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-28-2005, 12:10 AM
  5. Countries you have visited.
    By Bluffcove in forum 2005 Archive Room
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 09-09-2005, 11:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts