Türk porno yayini yapan http://www.smfairview.com ve http://www.idoproxy.com adli siteler rokettube videolarini da HD kalitede yayinlayacagini acikladi. Ayrica porno indir ozelligiyle de http://www.mysticinca.com adli porno sitesi devreye girdi.
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 68

Thread: Not the State of the Site

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    9,266

    Default Not the State of the Site

    If there's one thing that pisses off a civil libertarian like me more than censorship, it's people who substitute words for the ones I wrote and leave the new words attributed to me.

    If you need to be a censor, do me the favour of at least deleting what I said rather than subsituting your own words for mine and leaving the rest of the world to think that I was so stupid as to use your words.

    I will defend what I say, but not what others choose to substitute for what I said.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    9,266

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    P.S.

    I suppose this will be locked after changing the text, just like the thread to which I object and which I cannot change because a mod has chosen to misrepresent what I said and then prevented me responding to the words he substituted for mine by locking the thread after putting his own words over my name.

    And who said the Nazis were the only ones to corrupt what people said?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paramilitary wing of CAMRA
    Posts
    4,099

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    What are you on about? I'm only aware of one thread being locked today, and I didn't edit your post in that thread at all. Nor, so far as I can tell using my mod superpowers, did anyone else.
    I have neither the time nor the inclination to differentiate between the incompetent and the merely unfortunate - Curtis E LeMay

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia-Melbourne
    Posts
    623

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by Rising Sun* View Post
    P.S.

    I suppose this will be locked after changing the text, just like the thread to which I object and which I cannot change because a mod has chosen to misrepresent what I said and then prevented me responding to the words he substituted for mine by locking the thread after putting his own words over my name.

    And who said the Nazis were the only ones to corrupt what people said?
    Now you know how i feel everyday, when a cirtain mod always locks my threads.
    How does it feel to live in my world?
    Last edited by aly j; 10-31-2008 at 04:56 PM. Reason: spelling

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Guildford, England
    Posts
    1,423

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Well, you do create tonnes of them. Some others have many posts, and very little threads. You have high post number, and HUGE topic number.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    7,402

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by Rising Sun* View Post
    If there's one thing that pisses off a civil libertarian like me more than censorship, it's people who substitute words for the ones I wrote and leave the new words attributed to me.

    If you need to be a censor, do me the favour of at least deleting what I said rather than subsituting your own words for mine and leaving the rest of the world to think that I was so stupid as to use your words.

    I will defend what I say, but not what others choose to substitute for what I said.
    For the record, that was me. I apologize for offending you. But my intention, as unexpectedly I was interrupted by work, was to merge all these threads into one super discussion thread where everyone would have input. I didn't mean to censor you. But I guess I was hijacking your thread which was closed anyways. In any case, there seems to be a spastic discussion in about four different threads and a bunch of PMs...

    I think what we need are ideas and constructive suggestions, not calling each other out...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    7,402

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by aly j View Post
    Now you know how i feel everyday, when a cirtain mod always locks my threads.
    How does it feel to live in my world?

    You must work hard to diligently misspell at this point...

    And as far as your world, aren't you too from the same city?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,857

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post
    What are you on about? I'm only aware of one thread being locked today, and I didn't edit your post in that thread at all. Nor, so far as I can tell using my mod superpowers, did anyone else.
    The Mods we have right now will not edit your posts. If you believe this has happened then PM me and I will get onto it. This has happened in the past and i will not allow it on my watch.


    Of course, they will edit a post if it deemed to be outrageous or some other way over the top as to offend,,,,,

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paramilitary wing of CAMRA
    Posts
    4,099

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    Of course, they will edit a post if it deemed to be outrageous or some other way over the top as to offend,,,,,
    Furthermore, if they do so it will usually have something like <EDITED> in it, and be signed by the mod in question at the bottom of the post with an explanation, frequently accompanied by a PM.
    I have neither the time nor the inclination to differentiate between the incompetent and the merely unfortunate - Curtis E LeMay

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,857

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    I reiterate here.

    We have an excellent and very experienced Mod team here. They all have the utmost trust of the chief Mods and site owner and are trusted to carry out their duties.

    If anyone has a problem with this valued contribution then they should PM either myself or Gen Sandworm.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia-Melbourne
    Posts
    623

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by Nickdfresh View Post
    You must work hard to diligently misspell at this point...

    And as far as your world, aren't you too from the same city?
    I'm shocked hear, you gave me a nice responce WOW.

    Yes R/S and ALY J [me] are from the same city- Poor me!

    It's not my fault i'm a bad speller- I can't help it, i do try and spell right.

    I can't believe you pee off R/S youre best friend, never thought you do that to R/S.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    7,402

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by aly j View Post
    ..

    It's not my fault i'm a bad speller- I can't help it, i do try and spell right.
    It's your fault you can't be bothered to use a spellchecker. And it also seems that you've spelled something correctly and write a half-way literate sentence, only to be followed by a conscientious misspelling of the very same word with a butchered sentence...

    Sorry hun', you can drop the act now...

    I can't believe you pee off R/S youre best friend, never thought you do that to R/S.
    He'll get over it...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Guildford, England
    Posts
    1,423

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by Nickdfresh View Post
    He'll get over it...
    Yes, but when?

    This seems to be an open revolt against the feebleness of the mods. There need to be some changes here, this I agree upon, but most things aren't bad as they are presently. The mods should be able to ban IPs, if they make a thread/post in a banning thread giving a viable reason for the banning of said IP address. The mods should also be able to appoint temporary mods when the influx of spam/nonsense/sh*t/f*cktards/etc. becomes to strong. This way the entire board doesn't rely on a few mods with small powers who can only delete posts and threads, and 3 admins that don't show up too often, yet can do what this place needs. Having temp mods during the influx would relieve stress for the mods already here.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paramilitary wing of CAMRA
    Posts
    4,099

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by Churchill View Post
    Having temp mods during the influx would relieve stress for the mods already here.
    No, it wouldn't. We'd spend more time keeping an eye on the new mods than we ever would need to do were we to do the work ourselves.
    I have neither the time nor the inclination to differentiate between the incompetent and the merely unfortunate - Curtis E LeMay

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    9,266

    Default Re: Not the State of the Site

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post
    No, it wouldn't. We'd spend more time keeping an eye on the new mods than we ever would need to do were we to do the work ourselves.
    I'm not sure about that.

    I think I've suggested once or more that limited powers could be granted to limited mods who could deal only with clear spammers, like the botox idiot or whatever he's called, but who could not otherwise do any modding.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •