Türk porno yayini yapan http://www.smfairview.com ve http://www.idoproxy.com adli siteler rokettube videolarini da HD kalitede yayinlayacagini acikladi. Ayrica porno indir ozelligiyle de http://www.mysticinca.com adli porno sitesi devreye girdi.

View Poll Results: What do you think about a Reputation rating system for ww2ic

Voters
11. You may not vote on this poll
  • I'm for it

    4 36.36%
  • I'm against it

    3 27.27%
  • I dont care eother way

    4 36.36%
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Reputation systems

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,857

    Default Reputation systems

    In your opinion would a Reputation system that gives positive or negative points for individual posts be a worthwhile addition to this site?

    I am aware that this can and does cause problems on some other sites but it also can be a positive encouragement to thoughtful posts.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    251

    Default

    i voted for it although i am skeptical as to whether or not it should be on a forum where posts often turn into debates

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paramilitary wing of CAMRA
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    We do already have something similar with the "Outstanding Post" medal. Beyond that I don't care - where used on other sites I simply ignore it. Reputation systems tend to be pretty unobtrusive, so if you don't like them or use them it's really easy to ignore them.
    I have neither the time nor the inclination to differentiate between the incompetent and the merely unfortunate - Curtis E LeMay

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    9,270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    I am aware that this can and does cause problems on some other sites but it also can be a positive encouragement to thoughtful posts.
    I'm against anything that encourages thought.

    Seriously, it's not an idea I favour, if only because the risk of a negative rating will discourage some people from posting and encourage complaints about negative ratings awarded.

    Awarding ratings, good or bad, is a highly subjective exercise which is likely to cause more harm than good.

    There's nothing to stop an informal "Good post" from a mod or anyone else under the current system.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Back in Indiana
    Posts
    3,055

    Default

    If you guys are interested then im sure we can do something about it. However I like the awards system for this representation. You get awards for positive actions. I dont like acknowledgments for negative actions. Although you can get an infraction point for those .......... yet we usually dont advertise that fact.

    101st Airborne

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,392

    Default

    It would something interesting to see, but I am not diying for it, aniway if somebody can do it go for it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,857

    Default

    I'm not advocating it, merely enquiring about it. Only 6 members have responded so I think we should let it run its course.

    My post was merely to see if guys thought it would enhance or detract from the site, so far all options appear to be even.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Up in the land of the Yoopers.
    Posts
    4,302

    Default

    It is interesting, but seems to be adding more steps to get to the same place. I would not favor the addition of such a system.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    251

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post
    We do already have something similar with the "Outstanding Post" medal. Beyond that I don't care - where used on other sites I simply ignore it. Reputation systems tend to be pretty unobtrusive, so if you don't like them or use them it's really easy to ignore them.

    i'm not saying it would be a large problem, i mean hell i dont fight with anyone so i should be fine, i just don't want somebody giving someone else negative points in a moment of rage cause they disagree

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    743

    Default

    I dont care ethier way but it would be cool and it could feel like xbox live but its up to the moderators


    "A pint of sweat saves a gallon of blood."
    - General George S. Patton
    "War Isn't about Dying for your country, its about making the other basterd die for his." - Patton

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    348

    Default

    IMO, reputation system may increase the quality of posts, but decrease the amount of them.

    So, do moderators want more posts (=more traffic), or more quality posts?

    _
    Amazing Metal Detector Finds.
    Hand-picked World War II and Third Reich news every day.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    7,403

    Default

    At the site I mod on, we have a "star-system" that I've grown to find to be, well, gay...

    Firstly, the actual "best posters" often do not have five stars (scale of one to five), and I get really annoyed when I see posts like, "great! five stars comin' at cha'!"

    "Hey thanks, five stars back at cha!" It's just a bit cheesy. Especially when we had the crazy interweb bitch of a troll to end all crazy internet trolls (banned from every Van Halen related board for making, and often carrying out, threats). One of the more benign things she would do is create dozens (if not close to 100s) of aliases and vote one-stars to people she hated, and so she would have a back up user-ID when banned...

    If you did a system, a better one would be a system in which a positive or negative point is given, and the rater must write a comment on what the rating is all about. I guess that's okay...
    Last edited by Nickdfresh; 09-07-2007 at 01:36 PM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    251

    Default

    i know what you mean, a couple years ago i once was threatened with being banned from a forum because i was on there registered but rarely posted, however any thread you went to had 80% BS posts, Great Post!, WOW!!! Coolio, OMG!! thats so funny!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •