Türk porno yayini yapan http://www.smfairview.com ve http://www.idoproxy.com adli siteler rokettube videolarini da HD kalitede yayinlayacagini acikladi. Ayrica porno indir ozelligiyle de http://www.mysticinca.com adli porno sitesi devreye girdi.

View Poll Results: Do you think that atomic bombing of Japan was a war crime?

Voters
165. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, it was a war crime

    30 18.18%
  • I'm not sure

    12 7.27%
  • No, it was a way of ending war and saving lives

    123 74.55%
Page 60 of 60 FirstFirst ... 105051525354555657585960
Results 886 to 888 of 888

Thread: Should the atomic bombs have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

  1. #886
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    22

    Default Re: Should the atomic bombs have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

    I honestly believe that at the end... Japan was unable to mount any kind of defense of Japan itself. It might have been slow going, but I don't think Japan could have done much - by the time the bombs fell, I they were having problems feeding themselves.

    I think they were looking for a reason to call it quits and the two bombings gave them the reason.

  2. #887

    Default Re: Should the atomic bombs have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
    I honestly believe that at the end... Japan was unable to mount any kind of defense of Japan itself. It might have been slow going, but I don't think Japan could have done much - by the time the bombs fell, I they were having problems feeding themselves.

    I think they were looking for a reason to call it quits and the two bombings gave them the reason.
    ..and the Soviet invasion (which I heard actually had much more influence on them than the bombs did).

  3. #888
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    22

    Default Re: Should the atomic bombs have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
    I honestly believe that at the end... Japan was unable to mount any kind of defense of Japan itself. It might have been slow going, but I don't think Japan could have done much - by the time the bombs fell, I they were having problems feeding themselves.

    I think they were looking for a reason to call it quits and the two bombings gave them the reason.
    One of the books I have in my collection is by a submariner, and their sub was ordered to Tokyo for the surrender. Somehow directly afterwards the writer of the book ended up touring a local submarine base, and his description of the base itself and Japan at the time makes it sound like they were barely getting by as it was.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. anniversary of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
    By Commando Jordovski in forum 2005 Archive Room
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 08-11-2005, 11:22 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •