Türk porno yayini yapan http://www.smfairview.com ve http://www.idoproxy.com adli siteler rokettube videolarini da HD kalitede yayinlayacagini acikladi. Ayrica porno indir ozelligiyle de http://www.mysticinca.com adli porno sitesi devreye girdi.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Luftwaffe Kill Claims

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NSW Australia
    Posts
    544

    Default Luftwaffe Kill Claims

    So were the fantastic kill claims by the likes of Hartman, Barkhorn, Rall and the other high scoring Experten of the luftwaffe, indeed genuine? At some time or other there have been serious challenges to these claims, some of them backed up by facts, some purely from jealousy or politics.

    It works both ways, as claims by the top Soviet aces have been challenged in the west.

    Allowing for the natural tendency to claim a victory in a confused combat, it is obvious many cases of discrepencies were of an accidental nature rather than a deliberate deception.

    The Luftwaffe claim process was quite complex and hundreds if not thousands of claims were still awaiting recognition in Berlin at the end of the war. Of course the process was far speedier if there was a witness to a claim or wreckage recovered. Similarly the introduction of gun cameras from 1942 cleared many disputes and false/accidental claims.

    Would have the top Allied pilots have equalled the experten of the Luftwaffe? Certainly if they had fought under the same conditions the top Allied pilots would have amassed incredible scores.

    Regards digger.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,392

    Default

    Hartmann claims were officially confirmed until his 307th victory after that due the delay in the paperwork to gave the official confirmation... the war simply was over.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NSW Australia
    Posts
    544

    Default

    A lot of people still dispute the figure of 307 victories and indeed the claims of most of the experten.

    Hartman was once challenged by a pilot from another unit over his claims and was offered to fly a mission with him. After his one mission experience with Hartman an apology was offered, but I cannot recall how many kills Hartman made that day.

    Regards digger.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,392

    Default

    You are refering to this:

    The sudden steep rise in "Bubi" Hartmann's success rate created suspicion among several other fighter pilots. One of them was Lt. Fritz Obleser, a twenty-year-old Austrian who had joined JG 52 a couple of months after Hartmann. Obleser also had achieved a large number of victories, and he found it hard to believe that another relative newcomer could rise to such level in such a short space of time.

    So Obleser asked the Gruppenkommandeur if he was allowed to fly a mission with Hartmann, and he received permission to do so. Hartmann and Obleser took off from Novo-Zaporozhye at 1200 hours on 1 October 1943. As they returned fifty-five minutes later, Obleser admitted that his earlier suspicions toward Hartmann had been unfounded; he had personally witnessed how Hartmann had blown two La-5s out of the sky in a matter of minutes


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NSW Australia
    Posts
    544

    Default

    Thanks Panzerknacker, that is the correct incident. Unfortunately a lot of my research material is buried at the moment, so I can't draw on info very quickly.

    Regards digger.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    127

    Default

    Again we must admit that every German kill claims was 100% verified.
    German aeroplanes like the Me262 were much better than the Allied ones.
    Bismark could not be sunk and had to be scuttled by the crew,
    German tanks also ran out of fuel and were not really knocked out
    German Generals were really good strategists.
    The German Soldier was by far the best soldier in the history of the world!
    It goes on and on ......................
    Really I do not understand how they manged to lose the war.

    Cue excuse number 1 ...............Outnumbered?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Frankfurt / Germany / Europe
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkenny View Post
    Again we must admit that every German kill claims was 100% verified.
    Indeed, it had to be verified before it counted as a kill in the Luftwaffe statistic, before that it was a mere claim and would be dismissed without verification. As already mentioned, usually gun camera footage was used for that purpose later in the war.
    Quote Originally Posted by mkenny View Post
    German aeroplanes like the Me262 were much better than the Allied ones.
    It was at least faster when it came to top speed. My overall impression of WW2 planes is, that they pretty much matched on all western sides. The British imho always held an edge in the motor department, while the germans were slightly better with aerodynamics, but that too varied from model to model.
    Quote Originally Posted by mkenny View Post
    Bismark could not be sunk and had to be scuttled by the crew,
    It could be sunk, but not by british guns in close range(that's what it was build to survive) but it was scuttled, after all it was merely a floating platform at its end.

    Quote Originally Posted by mkenny View Post
    German Generals were really good strategists.
    Some were, some were not ... guess that's pretty much the same everywhere.

    Quote Originally Posted by mkenny View Post
    The German Soldier was by far the best soldier in the history of the world!
    We are still talking about WW2, aren't we?

    Quote Originally Posted by mkenny View Post
    It goes on and on ......................
    Really I do not understand how they manged to lose the war.

    Cue excuse number 1 ...............Outnumbered?
    Well, being outnumbered by the margin the germans were in ww2 is a pretty good excuse to lose ....
    Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paramilitary wing of CAMRA
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drake View Post
    It was at least faster when it came to top speed. My overall impression of WW2 planes is, that they pretty much matched on all western sides. The British imho always held an edge in the motor department, while the germans were slightly better with aerodynamics, but that too varied from model to model.
    More or less. The big difference was in production - the Germans had a very bad habit of trying to put prototypes into mass production, without the small changes to fix bugs that prototypes are supposed to check for and without any input from the manufacturing engineers. That's a really, really dumb thing to do if you're trying to mass produce something.
    The British had their own problems (related to design for manufacture - they would design things that required skilled craftsmen to assemble, as well as a multiplicity of tools), but they had at least got the concept of prototyping.
    The US were in a class of their own during WW2, they really were the best in the world by a stunning margin. Men like W.E. Deming (whose postwar work was ignored in the US but turned Japan into the industrial powerhouse it is today) could do mass production with unskilled labour to a greater extent than had ever even been thought possile before. At times US productivity was approaching 10 times that of the Axis...

    Quote Originally Posted by Drake View Post
    It could be sunk, but not by british guns in close range(that's what it was build to survive) but it was scuttled, after all it was merely a floating platform at its end.
    Doesn't really matter. By the time the Germans tried to scuttle it (note that 60 years later there is only agreement that they attempted to scuttle it - nobody is really sure if the scuttling charges made any difference to the time of sinking or not) it was a barely floating wreck. All propulsion and steering had failed, nobody anywhere near the deck was alive, all the armament was disabled, it was very badly on fire and taking on a lot of water. Even with no RN interference and a large number of modern salvage tugs it would be touch and go to get it back into port at the time the charges were ordered to be fired. Had they managed to do so, it would be 40,000 tonnes of scrap metal encasing a big pile of bodies.
    Incidentally, one of the more generally accepted reasons Bismarck didn't sink sooner was that Rodney was so close. The shells were coming in on a very flat trajectory and hence did a mass of damage above the waterline but let very little water in.
    I have neither the time nor the inclination to differentiate between the incompetent and the merely unfortunate - Curtis E LeMay

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Frankfurt / Germany / Europe
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post
    More or less. The big difference was in production - the Germans had a very bad habit of trying to put prototypes into mass production, without the small changes to fix bugs that prototypes are supposed to check for and without any input from the manufacturing engineers. That's a really, really dumb thing to do if you're trying to mass produce something.
    The British had their own problems (related to design for manufacture - they would design things that required skilled craftsmen to assemble, as well as a multiplicity of tools), but they had at least got the concept of prototyping.
    The US were in a class of their own during WW2, they really were the best in the world by a stunning margin. Men like W.E. Deming (whose postwar work was ignored in the US but turned Japan into the industrial powerhouse it is today) could do mass production with unskilled labour to a greater extent than had ever even been thought possile before. At times US productivity was approaching 10 times that of the Axis...
    Jup, the numbers were impressive .. We can be happy that the Nazi really had no clue about efficient governing.


    Quote Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post

    Doesn't really matter. By the time the Germans tried to scuttle it (note that 60 years later there is only agreement that they attempted to scuttle it - nobody is really sure if the scuttling charges made any difference to the time of sinking or not) it was a barely floating wreck. All propulsion and steering had failed, nobody anywhere near the deck was alive, all the armament was disabled, it was very badly on fire and taking on a lot of water. Even with no RN interference and a large number of modern salvage tugs it would be touch and go to get it back into port at the time the charges were ordered to be fired. Had they managed to do so, it would be 40,000 tonnes of scrap metal encasing a big pile of bodies.
    Incidentally, one of the more generally accepted reasons Bismarck didn't sink sooner was that Rodney was so close. The shells were coming in on a very flat trajectory and hence did a mass of damage above the waterline but let very little water in.
    That's pretty much what I said floating platform and to close range for the 14" guns to penetrate the belt armor of the citadel. Should've tried long range, guess that would've worked as the deck armor was a pretty bad design in the bismarck class imho.
    Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paramilitary wing of CAMRA
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drake View Post
    That's pretty much what I said floating platform and to close range for the 14" guns to penetrate the belt armor of the citadel. Should've tried long range, guess that would've worked as the deck armor was a pretty bad design in the bismarck class imho.
    KGV was 14" and had major turret problems which meant it only took part early in the engagement. Rodney was 16" and did most of the damage.
    In any case, sensible tactics had nothing to do with sinking the Bismarck. The RN were out for blood and they wanted to see Bismarck die. That's why they got so close (to the extent that Rodney even used torpedoes!).
    I have neither the time nor the inclination to differentiate between the incompetent and the merely unfortunate - Curtis E LeMay

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Frankfurt / Germany / Europe
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post
    KGV was 14" and had major turret problems which meant it only took part early in the engagement. Rodney was 16" and did most of the damage.
    In any case, sensible tactics had nothing to do with sinking the Bismarck. The RN were out for blood and they wanted to see Bismarck die. That's why they got so close (to the extent that Rodney even used torpedoes!).
    Yeah, Churchill seemed pissed after losing the Hood as far as one can tell from old camera footage and I guess that was a common feeling.
    Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cordoba-Argentina
    Posts
    6,392

    Default

    Again we must admit that every German kill claims was 100% verified.
    German aeroplanes like the Me262 were much better than the Allied ones.
    Bismark could not be sunk and had to be scuttled by the crew,
    German tanks also ran out of fuel and were not really knocked out
    German Generals were really good strategists.
    The German Soldier was by far the best soldier in the history of the world!
    It goes on and on ......................
    Really I do not understand how they manged to lose the war.

    Cue excuse number 1 ...............Outnumbered
    Nobody have claimed that and this is trolling my friend, by now I let you pass, more like this and I going to edit your post, watch your step.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paramilitary wing of CAMRA
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drake View Post
    Yeah, Churchill seemed pissed after losing the Hood as far as one can tell from old camera footage and I guess that was a common feeling.
    Well, they could have pissed the RN off a bit more if they'd sunk the Victory, but probably not very much. Hood was something of a totem for the RN, if not in the way Hitler thought. He assumed sinking the Hood would demoralise the RN - when the reverse was true. There is something of a tradition in the RN of fighting a ship until it sinks under the crew, and this was no different. They were out for blood in revenge however.

    Incidentally, my Great Uncle served on the Hood in the 1920s. By WW2 he'd retired and was in the Merchant Navy instead - only a marginally safer job sadly.
    I have neither the time nor the inclination to differentiate between the incompetent and the merely unfortunate - Curtis E LeMay

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    7,414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post
    ...

    Incidentally, my Great Uncle served on the Hood in the 1920s. By WW2 he'd retired and was in the Merchant Navy instead - only a marginally safer job sadly.

    Safer?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Frankfurt / Germany / Europe
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post
    Well, they could have pissed the RN off a bit more if they'd sunk the Victory, but probably not very much. Hood was something of a totem for the RN, if not in the way Hitler thought. He assumed sinking the Hood would demoralise the RN - when the reverse was true. There is something of a tradition in the RN of fighting a ship until it sinks under the crew, and this was no different. They were out for blood in revenge however.

    Incidentally, my Great Uncle served on the Hood in the 1920s. By WW2 he'd retired and was in the Merchant Navy instead - only a marginally safer job sadly.
    Yeah, I guess Hitler never understood how normal humans tick. It is really puzzling, how he was building his false hopes about the war in some very significant areas on assumptions on how others would or better should behave and that others eventually were even stupid enough to believe, though he was always wrong.
    Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •