Türk porno yayini yapan http://www.smfairview.com ve http://www.idoproxy.com adli siteler rokettube videolarini da HD kalitede yayinlayacagini acikladi. Ayrica porno indir ozelligiyle de http://www.mysticinca.com adli porno sitesi devreye girdi.

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Ardee; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Re: Did US really devote only 15% of war effort to Pacific War?

    Agreed. But if you look, *I* never said anything about USMC Divisions. ;)
  2. Re: Did US really devote only 15% of war effort to Pacific War?

    In any case, as many as about 6,000 US Marines served in the ETO. I'd call that more than "few to none," though you're free to argue about their significance as a percentage of all those serving. The...
  3. Re: Did US really devote only 15% of war effort to Pacific War?

    Perhaps proving another point about lies and statistics: I've seen figures for Normandy that go as high as just a hair under 7,000 for ships "of all types" -- landing craft, tenders, warships, supply...
  4. Re: Did US really devote only 15% of war effort to Pacific War?

    Or if you count things like Lend-lease to the USSR (and the related shipping and other logistical resources) as part of the total US resources, maybe the 15% is a little closer to being accurate....
  5. Re: Did US really devote only 15% of war effort to Pacific War?

    To answer the original question, it does not seem that the 15% figure has validity. To quote from the official US Army Historical Office, "...although the Army devoted at least one-third of its...
  6. Re: Did US really devote only 15% of war effort to Pacific War?

    Off the top of my head, I have no idea how accurate the 15% figure is, but think it is an aggregate figure, not a goal for each service arm. But it does seem natural the US Navy would be allocating a...
Results 1 to 6 of 6