Suggestions for Management

Please list new features that you want. For example, some of you said you want a WWII Video game forum. What else?

[Sturmtruppen]

Please list new features that you want. For example, some of you said you want a WWII Video game forum. What else?

avatars,the possibility to put a link with our own avatar too.

i`m thinking what more,coz im very happy with the forum,like it is

[Gen. Sandworm]

If you could post the rank and post that it takes to get there. What privlages go along with them. Dont know if you might want to keep these secret or not. Up to you, I understand if you dont want to post them. Also many have made some recommedations under Site Recommedations. The biggest thing for the moment would be to be able to post your own avatars.

[South African Military]

Own avatars is probably what most people want right now. Maybe if you add another topic to the site called "WW2 resources" or something like that. So that we can list good books, movies, internet sites etc.

[Cactus]

a book forum :D

[Gen. Sandworm]

a book forum :D

We have a book forum that in General WW2 Discussion. You started it. Were you wanting a more indepth forum just devoted to books???

That might be cool. Each topic is a book???? Let me know what you think. :)

[FW-190 Pilot]

links to world war 2 flash game would be nice:D

[Cactus]

what ww2 flash games are tehe?

[FW-190 Pilot]

what ww2 flash games are tehe?
i dont know, i used to play a lot of flash game about world war 2, but many have shut down

[FW-190 Pilot]

that would take some research and work, so dont know if anyone is willing to spend the time to do it
we gather as many info for any movies, games and make a review for it, you know, which one is worth to see and which one does not correctly describe the history
and if possible, have some bio for generals in world war 2 (in detail)

and the pm is not working well, most of the time it didnt alert me for new pm

[Sturmtruppen]

i have a cool idea!!! :D (i think it`s cool :roll: ),WE CAN HAVE A CHAT!!! for this site only,a chat here will be great!!! :)

[FW-190 Pilot]

i suggest each military section should have a different avator, currently they are the same and it seems to be very boring, i suggest putting the leader of world war 2 in there would be a good idea

[South African Military]

i suggest each military section should have a different avator, currently they are the same and it seems to be very boring, i suggest putting the leader of world war 2 in there would be a good idea

good idea! for the British forum you put Winston Churchill, for Russian Joseph Stalin, etc. And for the off topic you can be creative! :D

[FW-190 Pilot]

i suggest each military section should have a different avator, currently they are the same and it seems to be very boring, i suggest putting the leader of world war 2 in there would be a good idea

good idea! for the British forum you put Winston Churchill, for Russian Joseph Stalin, etc. And for the off topic you can be creative! :D
thanks for agreeing with me, now can you reply my pm :wink: thanks:)

[Komissar Ombrok]

I can make that pictures if you need. But you need to contact with admin to upload them. But looks like admin is out again...

[Sturmtruppen]

i have a cool idea!!! :D (i think it`s cool :roll: ),WE CAN HAVE A CHAT!!! for this site only,a chat here will be great!!! :)

what about a chat of this site? (only for members of the forum)

and what about our own avatars (fill a field with the adress of the image you want for avatar,like images hosted at imageshack.com),that will be a great idea!,if we have different avatars (all refered to ww2 of course!) this forum will have more life,if the admin can,i think that will be great! :D

[FW-190 Pilot]

how about we all join together to work on a world war 2 movie review database, that would be unique and would able to attract more people to come to this forum

[Gen. Sandworm]

how about we all join together to work on a world war 2 movie review database, that would be unique and would able to attract more people to come to this forum

Now thats a great idea........dont know exactly how we would go about doing it. But a list of ww2 movies with objective reviews would be great.

[Gen. Sandworm]

ww2admin please add FW-190 and I as moderators to the WW2 book forum. The Jet engine topic needs to be moved. Thanks.

I renamed this topic from "What are some new features you want" to the present title so that you may know what some of the member's want that the mods cannot do.

[FW-190 Pilot]

how about we all join together to work on a world war 2 movie review database, that would be unique and would able to attract more people to come to this forum

Now thats a great idea........dont know exactly how we would go about doing it. But a list of ww2 movies with objective reviews would be great.
I think i just need to write some opinion of movies you have seen, and grade it
5 stars - great, perfect
4 stars - very good
3 stars - its worth to take a look
2 stars - poor quality
1 stars - garbage

[South African Military]

how about we all join together to work on a world war 2 movie review database, that would be unique and would able to attract more people to come to this forum

Now thats a great idea........dont know exactly how we would go about doing it. But a list of ww2 movies with objective reviews would be great.
I think i just need to write some opinion of movies you have seen, and grade it
5 stars - great, perfect
4 stars - very good
3 stars - its worth to take a look
2 stars - poor quality
1 stars - garbage

admin makes a new forum, then all we do is make reviews on movies and rate them etc.

HI everyone,
I am still alive:) I have been out of town again. I noticed that Google now has this site as #1 when you type in "world war 2 pictures". That's great! Lots of people should be joining the site now.

I will be working on some new changes to the site including some new forums that you guys want. Also, I have a new WWII Gaming site that is almost done. I think you all will like it.

I will respond to everyone's PM soon. Thanks for making this a great place.

[Gen. Sandworm]

how about we all join together to work on a world war 2 movie review database, that would be unique and would able to attract more people to come to this forum

Now thats a great idea........dont know exactly how we would go about doing it. But a list of ww2 movies with objective reviews would be great.
I think i just need to write some opinion of movies you have seen, and grade it
5 stars - great, perfect
4 stars - very good
3 stars - its worth to take a look
2 stars - poor quality
1 stars - garbage

admin makes a new forum, then all we do is make reviews on movies and rate them etc.

This would be a good idea maybe we can have a topic on each movie and then the associated poll we can have the vote averaged. So a movie like Saving private ryan would get a 4.8 coz somebody didnt like it. This would be nice. Not sure if the forum can be set up like this.

[BDL]

Any chance of some WW2 British Army avatars?

I feel quite dirty with a picture of a crab on all my posts

[Gen. Sandworm]

Hey Guys if you havent noticed im an admin now. So I will be working on the site here in the next couple of days. So if you have any suggestions please give them. Im still trying to figure out the Admin panel so might take me awhile on some of your requests but I will do my best to work on them. Let me know whats up.

[FW-190 Pilot]

Hey Guys if you havent noticed im an admin now. So I will be working on the site here in the next couple of days. So if you have any suggestions please give them. Im still trying to figure out the Admin panel so might take me awhile on some of your requests but I will do my best to work on them. Let me know whats up.
do you have some pics for avatar, if you can find some german aicraft for it, that would be great:D
and hows the progress on the world war 2 game site?
thanks for telling :wink:

[Sturmtruppen]

great!!!!,nice to have another admin,and nicer,our new admin is general sandworm!!! :D

[Dani]

Congratulations Gen. Sandworm!

[South African Military]

Congrats!

[Gen. Sandworm]

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 6990 Posts per day: 52.05
Number of topics: 267 Topics per day: 1.99
Number of users: 179 Users per day: 1.33
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

Call it a State of the Union or whatever. Here are the current board stats. So please feel free to make suggestions. :D

Sat June 18th 2005

[FW-190 Pilot]

Providing ideas to make this forum a better one is strongly encourage, if anyone who is able to give good idea that i think its good enough, he/she will be promote a rank

[Crab_to_be]

Would it be possible to rig a system where the allowable avatar size increases with contributions? The simplest way would probably be to tie it in with the rank system. After all, rank and medals are all well and good, but I want a bigger picture! Also, it would be a clear reward that everyone could enjoy (except for those who only have small pictures anyway).

[Gen. Sandworm]

ww2admin just updated to a new version of the board ........ so if you were on the site the other nite im guessing you got a debugging message. My guess is that he was working on things and didnt know it affected the site.

I have noticed a bug with the new update. For example sometimes you will click on a post and it will come up that it does not exist. It is there but it seems that the computer is making an extra page when it doesnt need to. I and FW-190 will look into the matter and hopefully fix it. Please deal with the temporary inconveince. Thanks.

[Gen. Sandworm]

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 6990 Posts per day: 52.05
Number of topics: 267 Topics per day: 1.99
Number of users: 179 Users per day: 1.33
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

Call it a State of the Union or whatever. Here are the current board stats. So please feel free to make suggestions. :D

Sat June 18th 2005
Just an update. As you can see for youself that the site is doing well. Please feel free to make more suggestions.

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 10148 Posts per day: 64.23
Number of topics: 414 Topics per day: 2.62
Number of users: 266 Users per day: 1.68
Tue Jul 12, 2005

[Gen. Sandworm]

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 6990 Posts per day: 52.05
Number of topics: 267 Topics per day: 1.99
Number of users: 179 Users per day: 1.33
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

Call it a State of the Union or whatever. Here are the current board stats. So please feel free to make suggestions. :D

Sat June 18th 2005
Just an update. As you can see for youself that the site is doing well. Please feel free to make more suggestions.

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 10148 Posts per day: 64.23
Number of topics: 414 Topics per day: 2.62
Number of users: 266 Users per day: 1.68
Tue Jul 12, 2005

As you can see the site is continuing to improve greatly. Im glad to see it. Here are the current stats. As you can see all number are improving. Plus ive have noticed more activity on the board. Seems i cant log on now without new posts in all the forum. Thats just wonderful. Keep up the good work guys. We have alot of great posters now. Thanks

Number of posts: 13273 Posts per day: 75.44
Number of topics: 535 Topics per day: 3.04
Number of users: 303 Users per day: 1.72
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

As of July 30, 2005.

[Commando Jordovski]

I like what you have done with the forum avatar pictures changing them to a soldier from the country. :)

[Commando Jordovski]

I have an idea, what if you put sound, sound effects or perhaps even music on the home page of www.ww2incolor.com , it will be appealing to alot of people and to encourage them into the site a bit more dont you think ? :D :D

[South African Military]

I have an idea, what if you put sound, sound effects or perhaps even music on the home page of www.ww2incolor.com , it will be appealing to alot of people and to encourage them into the site a bit more dont you think ? :D :D

In my opinion I hate it when sites have music... but thats just my opinion

[Commando Jordovski]

Well it doesn't have to be music that's the thing :D :D
It could be like a sound effect of a gun being cocked and reloaded, or a soldier yelling "Achtung" :lol: , use your imagination :wink:

[Hanz Lutz]

Well it doesn't have to be music that's the thing :D :D
It could be like a sound effect of a gun being cocked and reloaded, or a soldier yelling "Achtung" :lol: , use your imagination :wink:

Why Achtung soldiers can yelling YPA. :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Firefly]

I agree with SAM here. Probably a bit childish. I also find it hard to yell YPA as I need a vowell between the Y and P for pronunciation purposes.

[Commando Jordovski]

childish :lol: , ok no worries mates just a thought :wink: .
Do any of you mates have any idea for the website, ill try and help in any way :) .

[Commando Jordovski]

where it says "Posts" next to your name and below your avatar and shows you how many posts you have currently posted, I think the Mods should make it so the posts are bigger and bolder and stand out a bit more !?!

[Cuts]

While I am fully aware that the posting of a PM received from another member is against site rules and hence I abide by them, does the administration not think that perhaps this may not be such a good idea ?

It seems to me that some PMs are sent from one party to another for the sole purpose of winding up or insulting the recipient.

If a member has something to say to another could it not be couched in such terms as are acceptable to the site as a whole ?
To send a PM to someone in the certain knowledge that it must remain hidden from view of the body of the membership smacks of cowardice.

Admittedly there are five members to whom a complaint about a PM one takes umbrage at can be directed, but that too seems to be a case of 'running to the teacher.' :)

I would have thought that our membership, regardless of age, was mature enough to stand by what they write and if they feel they would like to send a PM to another they are also man enough* to see it in open forum.


*Or woman enough, there are a few ladies with an interest in this subject and we must remain politically correct ! :lol:

[South African Military]

where it says "Posts" next to your name and below your avatar and shows you how many posts you have currently posted, I think the Mods should make it so the posts are bigger and bolder and stand out a bit more !?!

That kindoff gives the impression that the more you post the better, which isnt always good. You know what I mean?

[Commando Jordovski]

Yeah i understand where your coming from, like people will post pointless posts or even just emoticons just to get a raise in their post record right ?

[Dani]

Yep.

[Cuts]

Yeah i understand where your coming from, like people will post pointless posts or even just emoticons just to get a raise in their post record right ?

:wink:












Chill blokes - it's a joke !

[Firefly]

While I am fully aware that the posting of a PM received from another member is against site rules and hence I abide by them, does the administration not think that perhaps this may not be such a good idea ?

It seems to me that some PMs are sent from one party to another for the sole purpose of winding up or insulting the recipient.

If a member has something to say to another could it not be couched in such terms as are acceptable to the site as a whole ?
To send a PM to someone in the certain knowledge that it must remain hidden from view of the body of the membership smacks of cowardice.

Admittedly there are five members to whom a complaint about a PM one takes umbrage at can be directed, but that too seems to be a case of 'running to the teacher.' :)

I would have thought that our membership, regardless of age, was mature enough to stand by what they write and if they feel they would like to send a PM to another they are also man enough* to see it in open forum.


*Or woman enough, there are a few ladies with an interest in this subject and we must remain politically correct ! :lol:

I do have to agree that cuts does have a point. being abused by PM is not nice and it would be good to see the kind of abuse that some will perpetrate on others. The fact is that right now I can PM anyone about anything and it it not allowed to be posted, rather than encourage better behaviour, it will probably encourage worse.

Anyway I am now going to re-read the forum rules and send the Mods an example of blatant rule breaking.

[Tubbyboy]

While I am fully aware that the posting of a PM received from another member is against site rules and hence I abide by them, does the administration not think that perhaps this may not be such a good idea ?

It seems to me that some PMs are sent from one party to another for the sole purpose of winding up or insulting the recipient.

If a member has something to say to another could it not be couched in such terms as are acceptable to the site as a whole ?
To send a PM to someone in the certain knowledge that it must remain hidden from view of the body of the membership smacks of cowardice.

Admittedly there are five members to whom a complaint about a PM one takes umbrage at can be directed, but that too seems to be a case of 'running to the teacher.' :)

I would have thought that our membership, regardless of age, was mature enough to stand by what they write and if they feel they would like to send a PM to another they are also man enough* to see it in open forum.


*Or woman enough, there are a few ladies with an interest in this subject and we must remain politically correct ! :lol:

What about forwarding a PM? Is that allowed?

For example, if a member sends an insulting or otherwise objectionable PM, is is acceptable to forward it on to a Moderator?

How about a message that needs to be forwarded for some other reason?

I am only asking for clarification here as the message in question was patently inflammatory in tone and the sender obviously would not have said these things in the open forum as they would have earned him a warning (at least).

Bluffcove did break the site rules by quoting the message, but, in his defence, he did not say who it was from and the rules on dealing with an offensive message are not entirely clear!

Tubs

[Dani]

Anyway I am now going to re-read the forum rules and send the Mods an example of blatant rule breaking.


Do not post other members PM's on the site. If you recieve a PM from a member that you feel is offensive please forward it to our current administrators/moderators:ww2admin, Gen. Sandworm ,FW-190 Pilot, South African Military and Dani. We will then discuss it with that person and take action from there.


This is the current rule. Could be found on http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=2563#2563

Meantime I look forward to receive such examples!

[Dani]

What about forwarding a PM? Is that allowed?

For example, if a member sends an insulting or otherwise objectionable PM, is is acceptable to forward it on to a Moderator?

How about a message that needs to be forwarded for some other reason?

I am only asking for clarification here as the message in question was patently inflammatory in tone and the sender obviously would not have said these things in the open forum as they would have earned him a warning (at least).

Bluffcove did break the site rules by quoting the message, but, in his defence, he did not say who it was from and the rules on dealing with an offensive message are not entirely clear!

Tubs

Check my above post. Thanks.

[Tsolias]

A suggestion:
Members that have received their second formal warning,can't receive any medals.

[Sturmtruppen]

A suggestion:
Members that have received their second formal warning,can't receive any medals.

I can´t be more agree

[Cuts]

A suggestion:
Members that have received their second formal warning,can't receive any medals.

Hahahahaha ! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Thanks Tsolias, that's the funniest thing I've read all morning !
You've brightened the thread up considerably.

[Sturmtruppen]

A suggestion:
Members that have received their second formal warning,can't receive any medals.

Hahahahaha ! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Thanks Tsolias, that's the funniest thing I've read all morning !
You've brightened the thread up considerably.
Cuts,i see it a great idea,first,because the second warning is too much weak,and then,because it will make the users think before getting the 2nd warning.

Erwin

[Cuts]

A suggestion:
Members that have received their second formal warning,can't receive any medals.

Hahahahaha ! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Thanks Tsolias, that's the funniest thing I've read all morning !
You've brightened the thread up considerably.
Cuts,i see it a great idea,first,because the second warning is too much weak,and then,because it will make the users think before getting the 2nd warning.

Erwin

Come on Erwin, you can't seriously believe that people are concerned about site 'medals' can you ?
I'm sure Tsolias meant it as a joke.
(You did Tsolias, didn't you ? :shock:)

This is the Internet, it's a virtual world.
No-one firing on all four takes it that seriously.
As long as people can act maturely and stand by their posts it should be an enjoyable experience.

Similarly with the 'ranks' people get for their post count. It's a bit of fun !
I'm sure neither Dani nor SAM believe themselves to be colonels, and I can't imagine that Gen. Sandworm would assume he's a Major General either !

Having said that, we've all seen loads of obsequious brown-noseing, and mutually-congratulating posts where people are busting a gut to increase their count, (and ergo their 'rank',) but one hopes that this will remain the province of the socially and intellectually challenged.

Personally I like Man of Stoat's thread about the Dullard's Posting Checklist in the Off Topic - General forum.
It gives some very good pointers as to how people can post intelligently and generate a higher level of interest and input than, for example, the "What if" type threads.
http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=14819&highlight=#14819

[Sturmtruppen]

well,if you think that,then it will not be an important prohibition if you had it one day,so,what´s the problem?

(btw,stoatman's topic isn´t important,he has to give the example no to post topics about that and don´t respect it)

[Bluffcove]

HOW ABOUT

All messags that you send are public property and are not yours once you ahve sent htem, priovded htey are uneditted you may show them to whomever you like.

It might stop that argentine cunt from sending inflammatroy remarks, such as he did.

DANI read the message that I posted from Erwin Jizzer, it contains the phrase "whne you make this message public" Am I wrong to conculde that he thought i would make htis message public?

If he didnt want it to be public when he knew i would display it why did he send it? Is it because your forum rules purposefully protect him from retribution. I am sure that in any court of Law one cannot send messages and then prevent them being shown publicly you might like to read the case of Hewitt versus the Windsors. Its farly self explanatory if you have opinions in text that you dont want to be seen dont write htem down.

I agree medals should be stripped after second formal warning,

Whilst we are reviewing medals i suggest you look at hte post counts of those that are awarding them!
to whom they are being awarded
under what grounds htey are being awarded - (Wiki cut and paste does not equal - good post)

Who is missing from the medals honours list, and their respective value to the site.

I personally have lodged my medlas across my ring piece because htey are contemptible

[Sturmtruppen]

HOW ABOUT

All messags that you send are public property and are not yours once you ahve sent htem, priovded htey are uneditted you may show them to whomever you like.

It might stop that argentine cunt from sending inflammatroy remarks, such as he did.

DANI read the message that I posted from Erwin Jizzer, it contains the phrase "whne you make this message public" Am I wrong to conculde that he thought i would make htis message public?

If he didnt want it to be public when he knew i would display it why did he send it? Is it because your forum rules purposefully protect him from retribution. I am sure that in any court of Law one cannot send messages and then prevent them being shown publicly you might like to read the case of Hewitt versus the Windsors. Its farly self explanatory if you have opinions in text that you dont want to be seen dont write htem down.

I agree medals should be stripped after second formal warning,

Whilst we are reviewing medals i suggest you look at hte post counts of those that are awarding them!
to whom they are being awarded
under what grounds htey are being awarded - (Wiki cut and paste does not equal - good post)

Who is missing from the medals honours list, and their respective value to the site.

I personally have lodged my medlas across my ring piece because htey are contemptibleyes,messages are public,PRIVATE MESSAGES,no,you understand the name of private better than me,you speak english.
your posts in argentine thread were more since you did discrimination,and insulted (i thought you weren´t anti discrimination).

and you did more inflamatory posts.with your mindless jokes.

and im agree with that of good posts-wikipedia posts,but im afraid some "good posts" you think are only stupid out off topic stuff.

[Bluffcove]

Read the case of Windsor verus Hewitt,

once you ahve written something it becomes edict and therfore if you dont want it to be seen by others it should not be sent, the message arrived in my inbox and is my intellectual property to do with as I wish.

if you didnt want me to distribute it you shouldnt have sent it. and you certainly shoulndt have included the permissive phrase "when you make this post public."

You fail to understnad British humour that is your problem the truth is that I am in no way actively offending you, I won, I cna laugh all day long. regardless of your moderator willy waving

[Sturmtruppen]

Read the case of Windsor verus Hewitt,

once you ahve written something it becomes edict and therfore if you dont want it to be seen by others it should not be sent, the message arrived in my inbox and is my intellectual property to do with as I wish.

if you didnt want me to distribute it you shouldnt have sent it. and you certainly shoulndt have included the permissive phrase "when you make this post public."

You fail to understnad British humour that is your problem the truth is that I am in no way actively offending you, I won, I cna laugh all day long. regardless of your moderator willy waving
windsor vs hewitt???,huh?,what are you talking about?.

your intellectual property?,i buy a book,read it,then,it´s my intellectual property?,bluffcove,you are out of the rules,accept that.

british humour?,sincerely,i comprehend most of it,and it isn´t SOOOO funny,and i speak spanish,so,i think the only funny jokes in english are the graphic jokes.(like your offensive letter,bad but fun i have to say :lol: ).

[Bluffcove]

Erwin we will wiat for an English speaking Mod to deliberate over this one.
It is good of you to notice that you have no idea about citation of precedent, this will help my case.

Adieu

[Sturmtruppen]

Erwin we will wiat for an English speaking Mod to deliberate over this one.
It is good of you to notice that you have no idea about citation of precedent, this will help my case.

Adieu
You don´t have any idea of the forum rules,you have enough warnings to learn.

Take Care,

Ciao

[Firefly]

I put it to you Erwin that you as a Mod have broken more of the rules here than most of the members:

You have

1. Taken sides in discussions that you have been responsible for Modding.

2. Consistently insulted members of the above Forums.

and

3. Sent abusive PM's.

As I said, you need credibility to Mod and so far you have displayed nothing that shows me this credibility. Why cant you take advice from your fellow Mods behaviour.

[Sturmtruppen]

I put it to you Erwin that you as a Mod have broken more of the rules here than most of the members:

You have

1. Taken sides in discussions that you have been responsible for Modding.

2. Consistently insulted members of the above Forums.

and

3. Sent abusive PM's.

As I said, you need credibility to Mod and so far you have displayed nothing that shows me this credibility. Why cant you take advice from your fellow Mods behaviour.
1.discussions no,debate,and you made me to do that.

2.total fake,and,tell me what i have to do when im repeatedly insulted,and provocated.

3.I RECEIVED THEM TOO Cheers!,i shat on eva peron's grave.

he broken more rules,more than ironman,so,he has more probability to be banned than ironman! (he was banned,bluffcove never).

btw,you aren´t deffending him just because you don´t like me because i debated with you in the malvinas thread,and he´s one of your mates from the arrse,your forum,and you are british,are you?

[Sturmtruppen]

don´t search protection behind rules when you ignore them.

[Hanz Lutz]

Well done Erwin show bastards :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[FW-190 Pilot]

but as a mod, erwin, you should NOT return abusive PM, even one of our members did send you one, simply give them a warning about that.

And if you think a member has insulting message, just delete it if you are the mod of the area

[Firefly]

I put it to you Erwin that you as a Mod have broken more of the rules here than most of the members:

You have

1. Taken sides in discussions that you have been responsible for Modding.

2. Consistently insulted members of the above Forums.

and

3. Sent abusive PM's.

As I said, you need credibility to Mod and so far you have displayed nothing that shows me this credibility. Why cant you take advice from your fellow Mods behaviour.
1.discussions no,debate,and you made me to do that.

2.total fake,and,tell me what i have to do when im repeatedly insulted,and provocated.

3.I RECEIVED THEM TOO Cheers!,i shat on eva peron's grave.

he broken more rules,more than ironman,so,he has more probability to be banned than ironman! (he was banned,bluffcove never).

btw,you aren´t deffending him just because you don´t like me because i debated with you in the malvinas thread,and he´s one of your mates from the arrse,your forum,and you are british,are you?

Erwin, i stand by what I wrote, and its doubly so for you as you are a Mod.

I dont have a clue who Bluff is and he is more than able to defend himself.

I didn think I had an argument with you over the malvinas thread. In fact we were getting along quite nicely agreeing to disagree.

I dont visit Arrse much, as its for the British Army, which I have plainly stated Im not in.

I have not sent you an insulting PM?

I have watched your behaviour as a Mod, and am honestly dismayed by it. Remember you are a Mod.

I do however stand by a lot of what Bluff says, especially the bit about humour.

And finally, I enjoy discussing ww2 and all things military. I dont enjoy posts such as - Why dont the americans allow the Japanese an army. In my opinion they are just purile as was the Macedonia thread, which in my opinion was started with the purpose of bringing something from another forum here and has absolutely nothing to do with the purpose here.

[Bluffcove]

I claimed that I had shat on Eva Peron's grave because, Well I have, I was pissed and it was funny, Honesty is the best policy etc.

However it was in direct response to your cliams that you were going to go to the Islands and Rape my Ex girlfriend, somehow this set my teeth on edge. I suggest that the "new" Malvinas thread has gone the same way as the old one, at your behest due to your reluctance to apply equal logic to both sides of an argument.

I might add that Private messages are a place for individuals to continue a discussion in more depth, not for private amusment. Therefore i presume that you would allow me include a PM regarding the Falklands in my own post on topic. Your message did invite me to make the message public.

Erwin as a mod you are meant to be above the petty squabbles. unfortunatley not only are you involved in them you are the manifest and origin of nearly all the dullard-esque behaviour here.

[Sturmtruppen]

I put it to you Erwin that you as a Mod have broken more of the rules here than most of the members:

You have

1. Taken sides in discussions that you have been responsible for Modding.

2. Consistently insulted members of the above Forums.

and

3. Sent abusive PM's.

As I said, you need credibility to Mod and so far you have displayed nothing that shows me this credibility. Why cant you take advice from your fellow Mods behaviour.
1.discussions no,debate,and you made me to do that.

2.total fake,and,tell me what i have to do when im repeatedly insulted,and provocated.

3.I RECEIVED THEM TOO Cheers!,i shat on eva peron's grave.

he broken more rules,more than ironman,so,he has more probability to be banned than ironman! (he was banned,bluffcove never).

btw,you aren´t deffending him just because you don´t like me because i debated with you in the malvinas thread,and he´s one of your mates from the arrse,your forum,and you are british,are you?

Erwin, i stand by what I wrote, and its doubly so for you as you are a Mod.

I dont have a clue who Bluff is and he is more than able to defend himself.

I didn think I had an argument with you over the malvinas thread. In fact we were getting along quite nicely agreeing to disagree.

I dont visit Arrse much, as its for the British Army, which I have plainly stated Im not in.

I have not sent you an insulting PM?

I have watched your behaviour as a Mod, and am honestly dismayed by it. Remember you are a Mod.

I do however stand by a lot of what Bluff says, especially the bit about humour.

And finally, I enjoy discussing ww2 and all things military. I dont enjoy posts such as - Why dont the americans allow the Japanese an army. In my opinion they are just purile as was the Macedonia thread, which in my opinion was started with the purpose of bringing something from another forum here and has absolutely nothing to do with the purpose here.

1.im a mod,and i was choosed for that,and im happy about that,i try to do my best,and im not perfect.

2.you deffended bluffcove,when he appears in a thread,and angry with me,then you appear

3.Yes!,i said that before the trolls entered to the thread,and you are a bit at the deffensive with me.

4.Arrse,you are members,like this guys,you always help them in arguments,and you obviously have quite close ideas and posts (well,you have better posts,SOMETIMES)

5.have I sent you a pm with insults?,weren´t you defending?

6.the same i think of you,but luckily,we have great members too,and im not obligated to give my oppinion,but as you did,i do.

7.yes,you brit,me argentinian = you don´t like me :wink:

8.most of your posts are in off topic,i saw all,so,prove me what you say :wink: .

[Sturmtruppen]

I claimed that I had shat on Eva Peron's grave because, Well I have, I was pissed and it was funny, Honesty is the best policy etc.

However it was in direct response to your cliams that you were going to go to the Islands and Rape my Ex girlfriend, somehow this set my teeth on edge. I suggest that the "new" Malvinas thread has gone the same way as the old one, at your behest due to your reluctance to apply equal logic to both sides of an argument.

I might add that Private messages are a place for individuals to continue a discussion in more depth, not for private amusment. Therefore i presume that you would allow me include a PM regarding the Falklands in my own post on topic. Your message did invite me to make the message public.

Erwin as a mod you are meant to be above the petty squabbles. unfortunatley not only are you involved in them you are the manifest and origin of nearly all the dullard-esque behaviour here.

I said that?,i never said that,and you told me about your girlfriend,don´t expeculate with your errors. the new malvinas thread was finally done,where you posted about machos and hispanics,racist conducts.

i never invited you,i just tried to prove that you make pm's public,so you received the warning because of your errors (again :lol: )

cheers

Erwin

[Firefly]

Ewin

At least you are being calm.

I take on board the above points. I agree to disagree over the Falklands.

I do take exception to you saying that most of my posts are in off topic though. Though maybe lately your right as in the last 2 weeks the quality of new threads here has been dire.

Im going now and will have a think about whether or not I will be back.

[Sturmtruppen]

Ewin

At least you are being calm.

I take on board the above points. I agree to disagree over the Falklands.

I do take exception to you saying that most of my posts are in off topic though. Though maybe lately your right as in the last 2 weeks the quality of new threads here has been dire.

Im going now and will have a think about whether or not I will be back.
most of your posts are in off topic section,i posted lost of threads,and im disagree about malvinas too.

im calm down,but i want you to do the same.

and im also agree when clauss said F*** OFF.

im afraid it´s the only form of communicate when you insult too!.

homewever,stop insulting (EVERYBODY)

[Firefly]

Ewin

At least you are being calm.

I take on board the above points. I agree to disagree over the Falklands.

I do take exception to you saying that most of my posts are in off topic though. Though maybe lately your right as in the last 2 weeks the quality of new threads here has been dire.

Im going now and will have a think about whether or not I will be back.
most of your posts are in off topic section,i posted lost of threads,and im disagree about malvinas too.

im calm down,but i want you to do the same.

and im also agree when clauss said F*** OFF.

im afraid it´s the only form of communicate when you insult too!.

homewever,stop insulting (EVERYBODY)

If you can find me an insult in one of my posts I will leave ww2 in colour.

But it has to be a proper insult like the ones you have done.

[Bluffcove]

Erwin in your role as a mod is it your Job to make members "promise" to lave the forum when htey ahve receved no discip-linary warnings yet?

You have jsut asked Firefly to promie to leave, despite the fact he is perfectly civil what sort of a power trip are you on? were you the milk monitor at school? cos if you dont like them you can give them their milk laaaast so its warm! (gareth from the office, assistant regional manager, well assistant to the regional manager)

[Sturmtruppen]

Erwin in your role as a mod is it your Job to make members "promise" to lave the forum when htey ahve receved no discip-linary warnings yet?

You have jsut asked Firefly to promie to leave, despite the fact he is perfectly civil what sort of a power trip are you on? were you the milk monitor at school? cos if you dont like them you can give them their milk laaaast so its warm! (gareth from the office, assistant regional manager, well assistant to the regional manager)

I did her promise?,i just posted and deleted because you can misunderstand,i tried to said a : ARE YOU KIDDING,that my friend,it´s called argentinian humour.

what monitor :lol: ,it´s a joke?,those things aren´t common in argentina.

[Sturmtruppen]

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=9058&highlight=#9058
I go away for a few weeks and they make Erwin a MOD! The world turned upside down!


http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=9462&highlight=#9462
Its good to see that not everyone in your country has the same miopic views

(my views are miopic huh?)

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=10309&highlight=#10309
Walther wrote:
Debating with Ironman confuses me. Sometimes I think it is like fighting with a pig in the mud. Both will get dirty and the pig actually enjoys it.

firefly:
Jan I cannot agree more,


http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=10506&highlight=#10506
you doofus - IRONMAN is right!

Absolutely craking 1st post, not any relation to Ironman are U, your argument is both convincing and incisive, well done again on your 1st post. I look forward to more of the same..

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=11287&highlight=#11287
I am also fed up of his SHIT!

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=12584&highlight=#12584
Your beginning to sound like a certain banned one right now.

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=568&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30
You were a host for killers, how about Joseph Mengele
(=argentina is like a jail,a house for torturers).

:roll:

[Sturmtruppen]

My apologize about this topic,with out off topic debate.

[Cuts]

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=9058&highlight=#9058
I go away for a few weeks and they make Erwin a MOD! The world turned upside down!


http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=9462&highlight=#9462
Its good to see that not everyone in your country has the same miopic views

(my views are miopic huh?)

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=10309&highlight=#10309
Walther wrote:
Debating with Ironman confuses me. Sometimes I think it is like fighting with a pig in the mud. Both will get dirty and the pig actually enjoys it.

firefly:
Jan I cannot agree more,


http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=10506&highlight=#10506
you doofus - IRONMAN is right!

Absolutely craking 1st post, not any relation to Ironman are U, your argument is both convincing and incisive, well done again on your 1st post. I look forward to more of the same..

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=11287&highlight=#11287
I am also fed up of his SHIT!

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=12584&highlight=#12584
Your beginning to sound like a certain banned one right now.

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=568&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30
You were a host for killers, how about Joseph Mengele
(=argentina is like a jail,a house for torturers).

:roll:

What was that all about ?

[Sturmtruppen]

a reply to this cuts
If you can find me an insult in one of my posts I will leave ww2 in colour.

But it has to be a proper insult like the ones you have done.

[Cuts]

a reply to this cuts
If you can find me an insult in one of my posts I will leave ww2 in colour.

But it has to be a proper insult like the ones you have done.

Ok.
In that case none of those shown are though.

[Sturmtruppen]

a reply to this cuts
If you can find me an insult in one of my posts I will leave ww2 in colour.

But it has to be a proper insult like the ones you have done.

Ok.
In that case none of those shown are though.3

yes they are:
http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=15070#15070

[Cuts]

a reply to this cuts
If you can find me an insult in one of my posts I will leave ww2 in colour.

But it has to be a proper insult like the ones you have done.

Ok.
In that case none of those shown are though.3

yes they are:
http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=15070#15070

Does the '3' imply the third one down ?

[Sturmtruppen]

:oops: ,the 3 means,i hitted wrong button.

[Dani]

STOP POSTING HERE ALL OF YOU!!!!!! :x :x :x :x :x :x

What kind of freaky "suggestions" you have for the admin?
Open a thread in Off-topic if you want to "debate"!!

In agreement to our admin (FW-190 Pilot), actions will be taken shortly against Erwin and others involved in Falkland topic (with exception of Bluffcove - he already has a warning for posting a PM).

Remember that rules are subject to changes. Until then, are still unbeatable.

[Commando Jordovski]

A suggestion for the Mods.....
When Users are browsing a forum (where it says which current user is browing a forum) , Why dont we make a instant chat box when you click on their name ?, and of course if the person doesn't want to talk they can block or something like that, but i know you are not intending to make an instant chat room, so why not just an instant chat private message box when you click on the person's name who's currently browsing? :D :D :D

What do you guys think ???? 8)

[Dani]

In fact this is a suggestion for admin.

You could notice that it is written:
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

I don't know exactly if this forum could support this software demand.

[Commando Jordovski]

Oh really, well it just popped in my head to have a private convosation to people currently browsing forums :D

[Commando Jordovski]

Well Dani, Pity about the Software problem part, I think we should make this WW2 website as big as possible to the public , lots of links to go to, show the internet this is one of the best WW2 sites of all categories, were you either, posting on forums or looking at one from thousands of images from ww2.
etc etc..
You agree Dani :D ?
I will try and help the Admin as much as i can to make this site more expandable. :wink:

[BDL]

Anyway I am now going to re-read the forum rules and send the Mods an example of blatant rule breaking.


Do not post other members PM's on the site. If you recieve a PM from a member that you feel is offensive please forward it to our current administrators/moderators:ww2admin, Gen. Sandworm ,FW-190 Pilot, South African Military and Dani. We will then discuss it with that person and take action from there.


This is the current rule. Could be found on http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=2563#2563

Meantime I look forward to receive such examples!

In reply to Cuts' suggestion and the reply from Dani above, surely the PM that was posted for all to see was an abuse of the rules? It was personal abuse from someone in a position that should be above sending childish personal messages like that. Is there any 'punishment' for sending that kind of message - is it similar to doing it publically on the forum?

[Firefly]

Erwin got his 1st formal warning over it I believe, and as a Mod, if he receives another, he wont be a Mod any more.

[BDL]

Erwin got his 1st formal warning over it I believe, and as a Mod, if he receives another, he wont be a Mod any more.

Oh right, ta

[Sturmtruppen]

Erwin got his 1st formal warning over it I believe, and as a Mod, if he receives another, he wont be a Mod any more.

Oh right, ta
yes,i know you are happy about that.

but both you are out off topic!

[BDL]

yes,i know you are happy about that.

but both you are out off topic!

I personally couldn't care less Erwin, and the original question was on topic and answered by Firefly. Last you'll hear from me about it, I'm sick of arguing with you.

[Sturmtruppen]

I personally couldn't care less Erwin, and the original question was on topic and answered by Firefly. Last you'll hear from me about it, I'm sick of arguing with you.

me too.

[Dani]

Guys, why don't you ask for a usergroup (like those existing already) on which "NO RULE" is applying as a rule. Join all of you who wants to fight and the rest of us will be more able to discuss without such interferences (we'll don't have to read childish/angry/flaming/ etc etc posts). :(
It is a suggestion also for Admin.
With sadness,
Dani

[Sturmtruppen]

:oops: :( :cry:

[Firefly]

Guys, why don't you ask for a usergroup (like those existing already) on which "NO RULE" is applying as a rule. Join all of you who wants to fight and the rest of us will be more able to discuss without such interferences (we'll don't have to read childish/angry/flaming/ etc etc posts). :(
It is a suggestion also for Admin.
With sadness,
Dani

Hey, I dont want to fight, I was just responding to a question. Im sure Erwin has learned his lesson.

[Tubbyboy]

Guys, why don't you ask for a usergroup (like those existing already) on which "NO RULE" is applying as a rule. Join all of you who wants to fight and the rest of us will be more able to discuss without such interferences (we'll don't have to read childish/angry/flaming/ etc etc posts). :(
It is a suggestion also for Admin.
With sadness,
Dani

I did suggest such an area a while back, we got the off-topic area instead and that is being heavily moderated to keep things on topic!

WTF is that about?

[Dani]

I did suggest such an area a while back, we got the off-topic area instead and that is being heavily moderated to keep things on topic!
WTF is that about?
Shortly, I proposed a usergroup with no rules (anybody could fight with anybody in that group). Should be no topic (you said that off-topic area is being heavily moderated to keep things on topic), any user belonging could shout his fears.
...and all others could discuss easier. :wink:

[Sturmtruppen]

I did suggest such an area a while back, we got the off-topic area instead and that is being heavily moderated to keep things on topic!
WTF is that about?
Shortly, I proposed a usergroup with no rules (anybody could fight with anybody in that group). Should be no topic (you said that off-topic area is being heavily moderated to keep things on topic), any user belonging could shout his fears.
...and all others could discuss easier. :wink:
well,i want to join to that group.

it will have an own section?

[FW-190 Pilot]

i am trying to create a new room for erwin, but i dont know how to do it

[Gen. Sandworm]

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 6990 Posts per day: 52.05
Number of topics: 267 Topics per day: 1.99
Number of users: 179 Users per day: 1.33
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

Call it a State of the Union or whatever. Here are the current board stats. So please feel free to make suggestions. :D

Sat June 18th 2005
Just an update. As you can see for youself that the site is doing well. Please feel free to make more suggestions.

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 10148 Posts per day: 64.23
Number of topics: 414 Topics per day: 2.62
Number of users: 266 Users per day: 1.68
Tue Jul 12, 2005

As you can see the site is continuing to improve greatly. Im glad to see it. Here are the current stats. As you can see all number are improving. Plus ive have noticed more activity on the board. Seems i cant log on now without new posts in all the forum. Thats just wonderful. Keep up the good work guys. We have alot of great posters now. Thanks

Number of posts: 13273 Posts per day: 75.44
Number of topics: 535 Topics per day: 3.04
Number of users: 303 Users per day: 1.72
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

As of July 30, 2005.

Just another update........sorry i really need to go thru here and read alot more stuff. Will try and do this soon. Any here is the current state of the board. As you can see we are still growing.........happy to see that. Although just at a glance there seems to be a bit of disorganization lately.

Number of posts: 18700 Posts per day: 96.12
Number of topics: 689 Topics per day: 3.54
Number of users: 350 Users per day: 1.80
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

[Sturmtruppen]

I partially agree with Erwin here - the discussion is not relevant to the thread. However, I think the discussion has merit, in that it is reasoned debate on a suggestion made about improving the site. Unless someone objects, I will shortly (in half an hour or so, maybe) attempt to split the thread so that the suggestions remain, whilst the debate relating to one specific suggestion is preserved in a separate thread. Apologies if I horribly mutilate the post while attempting this.
i know,you are agree with him.
but you are out off topic.
another suggerence,control the mods when they/he does a bad work.

thanks

[Tsolias]

Her General check your pm's :!:

[FW-190 Pilot]

Her General check your pm's :!:
if you mean me, please send it again, my pm box is full and i cant receive yours
if you mean gen.sandworm, i guess he is very busy lately

[Tsolias]

I meant Gen. Sandworm but since he's busy,im sending it over to you.

[Dani]

another suggerence,control the mods when they/he does a bad work.
thanks

Your suggestion was applied since the beginning of our forum, Erwin!

Admin and Chief mods controls mods, Admin controls Chief mods.

[Sturmtruppen]

another suggerence,control the mods when they/he does a bad work.
thanks

Your suggestion was applied since the beginning of our forum, Erwin!

Admin and Chief mods controls mods, Admin controls Chief mods.
look closely on crab to be

[Dani]

I will ask all users that before to start posting here to read once again the name of the thread. Thank you.

[Crab_to_be]

I've removed all the posts between the last real suggestion for an admin and Dani's request that we post on topic. The inbetween bits are now in a thread called 'Not suggestions for admins' as it seemed like a better place for them
I hope no one minded me doing this.

[1000ydstare]

I have a suggestion. To cut down on irrelevant posts, could we have a thread entitled "Simple Smileys". In it we could enter the following...

1. Name of irrelevant post poster.
2. Link to irrelevant post.
3. Quoted copy of entire post showing irrelevant post.

The admins or mods could then deduct 10 posts from the irrelevant post posters account, 20 if the the post is edited, after inclusion on the "Simpel Smileys" thread, to make it less irrelevant.

The type of posts i feel are irrelevant are the ones that merely contain smileys and/or some kind of one or two word phrase such as "Cool", "sweet" or "Thats cool" etc.

And those which may also contain quotes from previous posts with above comments.

These posts serve no purpose other than to boost members post counts, and merely waste peoples time as they check the said forums for new posts that they mistakenly believe may be worth reading!!!

[Sturmtruppen]

that of the smileys made you to post a topic called "What is Erwins real rank?"

why don't you do the same with cuts?,cuts posted lots of smileys and first.

you also posted single smileys in other threads.

[PzKpfw VI Tiger]

Erwin, 1000ydstare, please calm yourselves, there's no need to incite an arguement over this. 1000ydstare, we've all done it, just let it go, attacking Erwin is not going to result in favorable conditions for yourself. And also 1000ydstare, don't make threads about deleting other users posts, because you have no power do to that.

[Sturmtruppen]

affirmative sir!

[Cuts]

that of the smileys made you to post a topic called "What is Erwins real rank?"

why don't you do the same with cuts?,cuts posted lots of smileys and first.

you also posted single smileys in other threads.

No worries, I'd be happy with that.

Just a couple of points.
I only posted those to lampoon your post-count hunt.
If anyone would care to check on your and my posts they will find that I use them rarely and mainly to underline a particular point to those whose English might make them miss an underlying meaning.
They will also find that you Erwin use them :
a) without informative text
b) in a far greater numbers than I, and possibly more than any other poster.
c) posted them before I did.

Point c) when checked for veracity will show the quoted post to be incorrect, proving once again that ERWIN SCHÄTZER IS A LIAR.

Anyone unclear ?

[Cuts]

Erwin, 1000ydstare, please calm yourselves, there's no need to incite an arguement over this. 1000ydstare, we've all done it, just let it go, attacking Erwin is not going to result in favorable conditions for yourself. And also 1000ydstare, don't make threads about deleting other users posts, because you have no power do to that.

True, 1000 has no authority to delete anyone's posts, but he has remained entirely on topic as the title of this thread indicates.
Further he has not started or 'made' the thread, it was in fact WW2admin.

(I'm not 'having a go' or getting at you PzKpfw VI Tiger, just ensuring that we don't get confused over things should any discussion result.)

[Crab_to_be]

Erwin, your last post deleted as all you did was quote the post above. If you feel the need to quote people, add you own comment or it will go to the post-bin to join the others.

If it's not worth your time to comment, it's not worth our bandwidth to read it.

[Sturmtruppen]

you are wrong,that suggestion must be for mods,admin have other things to do

[Cuts]

you are wrong,that suggestion must be for mods,admin have other things to do

If that is a reference to 1000ydstare's suggestion, then logically you think that only mods and admin should contribute to this thread.

That would make it a bit pointless for the others to read, so I imagine that WW2admin's reason for starting the thread was so that anyone could make a suggestion.
But maybe I'm wrong, maybe he did only want mods and admins to contribute to it, in which case my suggestion is that the thread should be accessible only to those people.



Edited to explain the last.

[Sturmtruppen]

you are wrong,that suggestion must be for mods,admin have other things to do

If that is a reference to 1000ydstare's suggestion, then logically you think that only mods and admin should contribute to this thread.

That would make it a bit pointless, so I imagine that WW2admin's reason for starting the thread was so that anyone could make a suggestion.
But maybe I'm wrong.

a suggestion for mods can be: delete large gifs that are too much heavy.

a suggestion for admins can be: add sounds to the site or a messenger.

[Crab_to_be]

A suggestion for Erwin is that Mods and Admins are capable of moderating or administering threads such as these ourselves, without him butting in and harassing other members.

[Sturmtruppen]

A suggestion for Erwin is that Mods and Admins are capable of moderating or administering threads such as these ourselves, without him butting in and harassing other members.
no.

im saying that admins work with the site and options of it.

and the mods work in moderating and deleting,editing or calming members.

admins can also moderate and that,but it's not the most important thing that an admin can do.

the admin does this when the mod isn't doing his work in the place of the problems.

[1000ydstare]

Grow up Erwin, just let things go.

[Sturmtruppen]

Grow up Erwin, just let things go.
shut up,boy of 19

[Firefly]

Grow up Erwin, just let things go.
shut up,boy of 19

Erwin, as you are neither an Admin or a Mod, and have clearly made your point, please stop banging on about it.

[Sturmtruppen]

Grow up Erwin, just let things go.
shut up,boy of 19

Erwin, as you are neither an Admin or a Mod, and have clearly made your point, please stop banging on about it.
you too,shut up

[Firefly]

Hmm exceedingly adult and informative post tha one. Are you actually tring for a ban?

[Sturmtruppen]

Hmm exceedingly adult and informative post tha one. Are you actually tring for a ban?
i guess you are.

[1000ydstare]

Crab_to_be nice capbadge!!!

QGS, ah those were the days.

[1000ydstare]

Erwin, you know I can't work out what is more tragic.

The fact that you now believe I am only 19, and will presumably never be told otherwise from now on.

It is uncoroberated hearsay, so it is obviously fact.

Or

The fact that you swallowed it hook, line and sinker (not to mention the boat) and have used it to try and lord it over me for that last hour or two!!!!

You must really miss your mod powers.

How does it go again...

Shut up, boy of 19

LOL :D

Please tell me you knew this was a wind up and were just playing along, and you haven't been sat at your computer with a grin from ear to ear for the last few hours!!!

[Sturmtruppen]

there goes another!

SHUT THE *:oops:* UP,boy of 19! :D .


in england,the boys of your age can drink beer?

Swearing eliminated by Crab.

[Crab_to_be]

You will all decist from posting here, unless it is a suggestion for an admin. Additionally, you will not swear in this thread. Threads have been edited for compliance.

Future off topic posts will be purged without further warning.

Edited to add: Swearing here was not as widespread as I thought. In fact, only the post above me, where the edit has been annotated.

Edited to add (2): Erwin's post purged as it contained no suggestions for Admins. 1000yds post edited to eliminate non-suggestion elements.

[1000ydstare]

Suggestion for Admin.

Is there no way the software can be programmed to reject or change the swearwords? Some forums do this.

<purged by Crab>

[Gen. Sandworm]

Suggestion for Admin.

Is there no way the software can be programmed to reject or change the swearwords? Some forums do this.

<purged by Crab>

Yea this can be done........but at the moment i dont feel it is such a problem. Im always open to suggestions so maybe we should poll it to what other members think?????

[Cuts]

Suggestion for Admin.

Is there no way the software can be programmed to reject or change the swearwords? Some forums do this.

<purged by Crab>

Yea this can be done........but at the moment i dont feel it is such a problem. Im always open to suggestions so maybe we should poll it to what other members think?????

I think the censor programmes are a double-edged sword.
People will always find a way round the swear-censor, just by altering the usual spelling.
The software will not recognise this but the human eye/brain will read the word as an expletive.
Further, some of them delete the strangest of words, wristwatch was one I couldn't understand until i looked within the word - wrisTWATch !

On another weapons discussion forum it was impossible to write 'cock the weapon' without the 'offending' word being starred out !

[Bluffcove]

Chicken is a banned word in your MSN profile for some reason. or at least it was a few months ago

try it. If you have absolutely nothing better to do with your time, otherwise you can just believe me.

[Man of Stoat]

SUGGESTION:

Some of the rules were enacted in haste by people who were mods at the time and are no longer mods to protect themselves from backlash from what they were doing on "other means".

It might be prudent to recind said rules, or at least reconsider them.

[FW-190 Pilot]

SUGGESTION:

Some of the rules were enacted in haste by people who were mods at the time and are no longer mods to protect themselves from backlash from what they were doing on "other means".

It might be prudent to recind said rules, or at least reconsider them.
sure, can you give some example?

[Hosenfield]

dumb question, how do you become an admin?

[Man of Stoat]

SUGGESTION:

Some of the rules were enacted in haste by people who were mods at the time and are no longer mods to protect themselves from backlash from what they were doing on "other means".

It might be prudent to recind said rules, or at least reconsider them.
sure, can you give some example?

This rule was brought in by Erwin at the height of the time when he was abusing BRITCON via MSN to protect himself from us exposing him and his abuse:

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=18061#18061
you can't post private conversations as chat,msn or conversations of out of the forum in this forum.
or you will receive 2 warnings.

This one was brought in by your good self, but is highly insulting to those of us who do our own research and work:

http://www.ww2incolor.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=7905#7905
No more complains about copying other people's work in public, if you have any complains in that field, please pm Gen.sandworm or me about it and we will take it seriously

*If anyone does this again, he will be ban without any warning*

If given a broad reading, it means that if one of us posts the source where a plageriser has copied from we get banned, since this could be considered as complaining.

[Gen. Sandworm]

SUGGESTION:

Some of the rules were enacted in haste by people who were mods at the time and are no longer mods to protect themselves from backlash from what they were doing on "other means".

It might be prudent to recind said rules, or at least reconsider them.

You are correct and I have mentioned this to the mods as well. It might be awhile but I do think the rules need to be readdressed.


dumb question, how do you become an admin?

You have to be really cool and really bored..........

:lol: :lol:

I was appointed admin by ww2admin. When I came to norway I made FW as my replacement. He is actually charge but since i have a bit of time here lately im try to do as much help as possible. So when we get old and gray im sure we will appoint someone new. I dont think ww2admin wants to many admins so at the moment I think FW or I would have to step down. First step would be becoming a mod and seeing how you do from there. We might need a new mod in the near future but just depends how things go. Hope this give you an idea. :wink:

[Cuts]

You are correct and I have mentioned this to the mods as well. It might be awhile but I do think the rules need to be readdressed.

I don't know how the rest of the readership feel about the posting of PMs, but personally I think that it should be permitted.

Particularly as it only came into force as a direct result of whining by a member who had been exposed as having sent an abusive and profane PM.


I realize that if someone feels 'offended' they have the option of contacting the Admins, but does that show the personality of the sender ?

Many of those that post here are younger people and that also brings up the unpalatable but very real possibility of grooming.
Putting a PM into open forum will show others who may have had contact with the said individual how he really is. Similarly the gen from MSN, etc.

[Firefly]

I personnaly think that guys should conduct themselves in PM how they do on the boards.

Therefore, abusive PM should be allowed to be shown.

[FW-190 Pilot]

the thing about posting pm in public is they can possibly ingited another flame war, which i extremely hate to see that happen

so that would be the best to complain to admin or mods via pm

[1000ydstare]

I would like to see PM allowed to be published.

Yes, Cuts makes a very valid point. There are some young lads on this site, that would gain added personel protection from this rule.

Also, as firefly states, the personal messages should be covered by the same rules as the site.

Flame wars on the site can be fanned by PMs, which can not be quoted.

Edit.
As an add on. Surely if you SENT the PM in the first place, you should be allowed to decide to post it later. It could be very informative and usefull to others later on, both to know what has been said and to whom, and it is your intellectual property so to speak.

Even if this rule is not changed fully, the author should be allowed to publish his own PMs at a later date, even if a recipiant is not.

But only if the PM was yours to begin with.

[FW-190 Pilot]

I would like to see PM allowed to be published.

Yes, Cuts makes a very valid point. There are some young lads on this site, that would gain added personel protection from this rule.

Also, as firefly states, the personal messages should be covered by the same rules as the site.

Flame wars on the site can be fanned by PMs, which can not be quoted.

Edit.
As an add on. Surely if you SENT the PM in the first place, you should be allowed to decide to post it later. It could be very informative and usefull to others later on, both to know what has been said and to whom, and it is your intellectual property so to speak.

Even if this rule is not changed fully, the author should be allowed to publish his own PMs at a later date, even if a recipiant is not.

But only if the PM was yours to begin with.

oic, you mean the pm you made yourself to be able to to post in public?

[Cuts]

the thing about posting pm in public is they can possibly ingited another flame war, which i extremely hate to see that happen

...

I can't imagine that they would be sent out of the blue, so they wouldn't ignite a 'flame war,' they'd only be the result of one.


...

so that would be the best to complain to admin or mods via pm

That's still pandering to those that would hide their weasel words.

If they are man enough to write to another member, they should be man enough to see their words in a public forum.


DS Solution:
If you aren't big enough say what you mean openly - don't write it.

It is purely a question of moral fortitude.

[FW-190 Pilot]

the thing about posting pm in public is they can possibly ingited another flame war, which i extremely hate to see that happen

...

I can't imagine that they would be sent out of the blue, so they wouldn't ignite a 'flame war,' they'd only be the result of one.


...

so that would be the best to complain to admin or mods via pm

That's still pandering to those that would hide their weasel words.

If they are man enough to write to another member, they should be man enough to see their words in a public forum.


DS Solution:
If you aren't big enough say what you mean openly - don't write it.

It is purely a question of moral fortitude.

i guess you are right, because this is a family-oriented forum, and young people might enter this site to see all these offensive pm, not very good

and yeah, i can disable a person's ability to pm others if that is nessasary

[Firefly]

In fact I would like to think that just becaue we are sitting at PCs over the world we can have the same basic common courtesy as we would do when engaging someone in face-to-face conversation.

If we were all in the Bar, there would have been some fantastic rumbles here due to the blatant incivility of some members here...

[Crab_to_be]

Would it be possible to remove the sticky at the top of Off Topic - General as it no longer serves a useful purpose? The forum rules already prevent impersonation, and in any case it actually only prevents people from impersonating Erwin, not any other site user, coupled with a threat that no longer carries any weight.

This post can also be deleted once the sticky ha gone as it will have outlived its useful life.

Edited to add: Thanks FW-190

[Cuts]

i guess you are right, because this is a family-oriented forum, and young people might enter this site to see all these offensive pm, not very good

and yeah, i can disable a person's ability to pm others if that is nessasary

Precisely because young people do have access to this site I'd have thought that it was essential that they were posted. See my earlier comment reference grooming.

I for one don't want the more unsavoury characters on the web thinking they could use this site to select their prey.

[FW-190 Pilot]

Would it be possible to remove the sticky at the top of Off Topic - General as it no longer serves a useful purpose? The forum rules already prevent impersonation, and in any case it actually only prevents people from impersonating Erwin, not any other site user, coupled with a threat that no longer carries any weight.

This post can also be deleted once the sticky ha gone as it will have outlived its useful life.
you are right, that would be done

[FW-190 Pilot]

i guess you are right, because this is a family-oriented forum, and young people might enter this site to see all these offensive pm, not very good

and yeah, i can disable a person's ability to pm others if that is nessasary

Precisely because young people do have access to this site I'd have thought that it was essential that they were posted. See my earlier comment reference grooming.

I for one don't want the more unsavoury characters on the web thinking they could use this site to select their prey.

sure, how about we allow posting pm in public, but users has to censor swear words before doing it

[Man of Stoat]

i guess you are right, because this is a family-oriented forum, and young people might enter this site to see all these offensive pm, not very good

and yeah, i can disable a person's ability to pm others if that is nessasary

Precisely because young people do have access to this site I'd have thought that it was essential that they were posted. See my earlier comment reference grooming.

I for one don't want the more unsavoury characters on the web thinking they could use this site to select their prey.

sure, how about we allow posting pm in public, but users has to censor swear words before doing it

Sounds good to me - as long as it includes "other means" as well.

[FW-190 Pilot]

rules changed

[Sturmtruppen]

yeah!,always erwin,crab,you are a mod or a guy who wants fights?

[Cuts]

sure, how about we allow posting pm in public, but users has to censor swear words before doing it

Sounds a great idea.

Everyone gets to see what's happening and minors are not shown profanity.

Makes everyone happy.

[Firefly]

From what date? I have some old PMs.

[Tsolias]

In fact I would like to think that just becaue we are sitting at PCs over the world we can have the same basic common courtesy as we would do when engaging someone in face-to-face conversation.

If we were all in the Bar, there would have been some fantastic rumbles here due to the blatant incivility of some members here...


Thats exactly what i would have typed if my English were better.

[stab_rechy_mech]

yeah!,always erwin,crab,you are a mod or a guy who wants fights?

Yeah you tell him Erwin you big tough grown up boy with pretty girl smile.
You show him who the manger was.

[FW-190 Pilot]

From what date? I have some old PMs.
any date is okay, just follow the new rules and you will be fine

[Bluffcove]

stab_rechy_mech Or should i| say Erwin stop creating accounts to support and bolster your own ego. If you want to insult the moderators for their decisions do it in person, there is no need to hide behind aliases I am tiring of it and its transparent.

[Bluffcove]

It has come to my attention that all of the threads in the main board appear similair.

We have "favourite * threads" - filth!
Equipment threads.
History threads
Personality threads,
Policy / politics threads
Battle and operations threads
campaign threads

In every one of the subsections of the index. the problem is that these are divided along national lines. If i want to read about WW2 machine guns I have to vist each antional htread and hten find each machine gun post. If I were to have an equipemnt htread this would be simpler and faster.

Equally if i want to compare the thinking behind SeaLion......and say barbarossa or Overlord we would have to visit the UK the US and the German nationally defined threads as opposed to a imple trip to the "campaign" board.

If I want to know about the battles in North Africa or The ardennes I would have to visit the British thread the German thread the French thread and the "other military units" thread. If it was to be based on "theatres" tyhen navigation would be alot simpler and moderating would be more easily facilitated.

We have people that know an awful lot oabout weaponry and equipment - people that specialise in history and econmic patterms, some of the guys here are serving soldeirs and can offer alot of information on campaigns and manouvers However the moderating staff are not able to use hteir expertise because the area they are asked to cover is so broad. In the Russian military thread for instance the MOD requires knowledge of the working parts of a PPSH, an understanding of the Caucasus geography, an awareness of the inner machinations of Stalins Politburo, not to mention an interest in the Red army as a whole!

I think it would be better if Moderators were only involved in their specialist areas of interest: not the larger national level as it is nigh impossible to be a master of so many disciplines.

bluff

[Cuts]

It has come to my attention that all of the threads in the main board appear similair.

We have "favourite * threads" - filth!
Equipment threads.
History threads
Personality threads,
Policy / politics threads
Battle and operations threads
campaign threads

In every one of the subsections of the index. the problem is that these are divided along national lines. If i want to read about WW2 machine guns I have to vist each antional htread and hten find each machine gun post. If I were to have an equipemnt htread this would be simpler and faster.

Equally if i want to compare the thinking behind SeaLion......
back later

This is a very good point.
Few people - if any - specialise in countries because there is generally an outside influence in tactics, eqpt, wpns, etc.
Battles, Ops and campaigns normally have more than one nation in them - especially in WWII.

It might be possible to put links to other fora on the various threads, if anyone's switched on enough to find decent software for it.

[Cuts]

Reference the PM notification, is it possible to make the 'Private Messages' text in the banner at the top of each page change colour when a PM is received ?

I have also been receiving notifications of PMs but on checking there has been nothing there - any ideas ?

[Bluffcove]

Im having a computer glitch everytime I type anything in response to IRONMAN I get the phrase

"investigate sex and travel"

tagged onbto the bottom of my post.

This is not intentional and I hope the problem can be remdied before I lose favour with the Moderators.
the simplest solution I feel would be to ban IRONMAN.

[PzKpfw VI Tiger]

Im having a computer glitch everytime I type anything in response to IRONMAN I get the phrase

"investigate sex and travel"

tagged onbto the bottom of my post.

This is not intentional and I hope the problem can be remdied before I lose favour with the Moderators.
the simplest solution I feel would be to ban IRONMAN.

Sure......................... And don't be speaking of banning IRONMAN, you don't have that power.

[Bluffcove]

no really - :shock:

not my fault, I just thought id let you know my computer was having a problem. :shock:

Im not going to be in trouble am I? :(

[PzKpfw VI Tiger]

no really - :shock:

not my fault, I just thought id let you know my computer was having a problem. :shock:

Im not going to be in trouble am I? :(

Wait were you actually being serious :lol:

[Sturmtruppen]

huh

[BDL]

Would it be possible to have an 'appeals' thread for those who get warnings, where they have a few hours or a day to give their reasoning for whatever they have done wrong and maybe get the warning/removal of posts etc removed?

[PzKpfw VI Tiger]

Would it be possible to have an 'appeals' thread for those who get warnings, where they have a few hours or a day to give their reasoning for whatever they have done wrong and maybe get the warning/removal of posts etc removed?

Doesn't sound like a great idea to me, but ask FW.

[BDL]

Doesn't sound like a great idea to me, but ask FW.

Think it would be a good idea in some cases - for instance where British humour isn't understood by one of the non-British mods and a warning is given for what was (to the British users) clearly a joke.

If we had an appeal process for warnings, the warn-ee could say to the warn-er - "look it's a British joke, it's not an insult" and undeserved warning would not have to be given.

[Gen. Sandworm]

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 6990 Posts per day: 52.05
Number of topics: 267 Topics per day: 1.99
Number of users: 179 Users per day: 1.33
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

Call it a State of the Union or whatever. Here are the current board stats. So please feel free to make suggestions. :D

Sat June 18th 2005
Just an update. As you can see for youself that the site is doing well. Please feel free to make more suggestions.

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 10148 Posts per day: 64.23
Number of topics: 414 Topics per day: 2.62
Number of users: 266 Users per day: 1.68
Tue Jul 12, 2005

As you can see the site is continuing to improve greatly. Im glad to see it. Here are the current stats. As you can see all number are improving. Plus ive have noticed more activity on the board. Seems i cant log on now without new posts in all the forum. Thats just wonderful. Keep up the good work guys. We have alot of great posters now. Thanks

Number of posts: 13273 Posts per day: 75.44
Number of topics: 535 Topics per day: 3.04
Number of users: 303 Users per day: 1.72
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

As of July 30, 2005.

Just another update........sorry i really need to go thru here and read alot more stuff. Will try and do this soon. Any here is the current state of the board. As you can see we are still growing.........happy to see that. Although just at a glance there seems to be a bit of disorganization lately.

Number of posts: 18700 Posts per day: 96.12
Number of topics: 689 Topics per day: 3.54
Number of users: 350 Users per day: 1.80
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm Made Aug 18

Number of posts: 26489 Posts per day: 110.56
Number of topics: 920 Topics per day: 3.84
Number of users: 421 Users per day: 1.76

October 2nd ............. board progress.

:D

[Sturmtruppen]

Doesn't sound like a great idea to me, but ask FW.

Think it would be a good idea in some cases - for instance where British humour isn't understood by one of the non-British mods and a warning is given for what was (to the British users) clearly a joke.

If we had an appeal process for warnings, the warn-ee could say to the warn-er - "look it's a British joke, it's not an insult" and undeserved warning would not have to be given.

I think we should "internationalize" the forum and most of its posts to be better for the understanding of any visitor/member of this forum,its better to share and we can also adapt most of the messages without lossing the real sense of it.
i think this would be better to improve the comunication between the entire comunity of ww2incolor forums.

[Gen. Sandworm]

Doesn't sound like a great idea to me, but ask FW.

Think it would be a good idea in some cases - for instance where British humour isn't understood by one of the non-British mods and a warning is given for what was (to the British users) clearly a joke.

If we had an appeal process for warnings, the warn-ee could say to the warn-er - "look it's a British joke, it's not an insult" and undeserved warning would not have to be given.

We been thinking about that but I really dont want to tell someone their appealrequest has been denied do to article 9 section 28.3.50.6.2 ......... :D More or less dont want the "he got his repealed why cant i have mine repealed. However I do agree with you. We were thinking maybe if you are good for 3 months you can have one removed or something.

[Firefly]

How about a sticky thread somewhere prominent where new guys can introduce themselves?

[Tsolias]

Doesn't sound like a great idea to me, but ask FW.

Think it would be a good idea in some cases - for instance where British humour isn't understood by one of the non-British mods and a warning is given for what was (to the British users) clearly a joke.

If we had an appeal process for warnings, the warn-ee could say to the warn-er - "look it's a British joke, it's not an insult" and undeserved warning would not have to be given.

Hey mate have you watched "My big fat Greek wedding" film?

There's a scene there were a new married couple is walking its way out of the church after the ceremony.
The Greek crowd (brides family) are spitting on them as they walked by.
This is a Greek tradition.It supposed to keep the jinx away.
The thing is that if i spit you im sure you'll get the wrong idea.

Conclusion (IMHO):
Keep the British humor for the British and it'll be ok.

[Firefly]

Well, make that the British, Australians, Canadians and New Zealanders and just maybe some Americans.....

[BDL]

Hey mate have you watched "My big fat Greek wedding" film?

There's a scene there were a new married couple is walking its way out of the church after the ceremony.
The Greek crowd (brides family) are spitting on them as they walked by.
This is a Greek tradition.It supposed to keep the jinx away.
The thing is that if i spit you im sure you'll get the wrong idea.

Conclusion (IMHO):
Keep the British humor for the British and it'll be ok.

That's the reason I suggested it, at the time a lot of British posts were being deleted and warnings given because certain Mods just didn't understand what they were saying. I'm sure if a load of Greeks were registered, it would be the same for you lot.

[Firefly]

I genuinely think that as long as this forum is in English and a lot of English speaking humour is a play on words that certain people will take things the wrong way.

Im sure its not going to change to another language, so English speaking humour is here to stay Im afraid.

[Tsolias]

I genuinely think that as long as this forum is in English and a lot of English speaking humour is a play on words that certain people will take things the wrong way.

Im sure its not going to change to another language, so English speaking humour is here to stay Im afraid.

I was talking about British humor-not English speaking humor.

[Firefly]

A very lot of it is the same. Culturaly that is.

I once had a fantastic trip to India with the military. Youd be surprised at just how many Indians had a similar sort of humour too.

[Tsolias]

A very lot of it is the same. Culturaly that is.

I once had a fantastic trip to India with the military. Youd be surprised at just how many Indians had a similar sort of humour too.

Former British Colonies doesn't count :twisted:

[BDL]

A very lot of it is the same. Culturaly that is.

I once had a fantastic trip to India with the military. Youd be surprised at just how many Indians had a similar sort of humour too.

Former British Colonies doesn't count :twisted:

That's three quarters of the globe out of the equation then :wink:

Anyhow, it was just an idea, if the Mods think it's unworkable, then fair enough.

[Cuts]

A very lot of it is the same. Culturaly that is.

I once had a fantastic trip to India with the military. Youd be surprised at just how many Indians had a similar sort of humour too.

Former British Colonies doesn't count :twisted:

Do former Turkish colonies ? ;)

[Sturmtruppen]

FW190,if you want to be in favour of the brits,at least don't be stupid and hide what you do!,why you forced me to change my avatar when there are others who have avatars that has nothing with ww2?.
i will choose the avatar that i want.

[Firefly]

YAWN.............................................. .................................................. .................................................. ....................................

[Gen. Sandworm]

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 6990 Posts per day: 52.05
Number of topics: 267 Topics per day: 1.99
Number of users: 179 Users per day: 1.33
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

Call it a State of the Union or whatever. Here are the current board stats. So please feel free to make suggestions. :D

Sat June 18th 2005
Just an update. As you can see for youself that the site is doing well. Please feel free to make more suggestions.

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 10148 Posts per day: 64.23
Number of topics: 414 Topics per day: 2.62
Number of users: 266 Users per day: 1.68
Tue Jul 12, 2005

As you can see the site is continuing to improve greatly. Im glad to see it. Here are the current stats. As you can see all number are improving. Plus ive have noticed more activity on the board. Seems i cant log on now without new posts in all the forum. Thats just wonderful. Keep up the good work guys. We have alot of great posters now. Thanks

Number of posts: 13273 Posts per day: 75.44
Number of topics: 535 Topics per day: 3.04
Number of users: 303 Users per day: 1.72
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

As of July 30, 2005.

Just another update........sorry i really need to go thru here and read alot more stuff. Will try and do this soon. Any here is the current state of the board. As you can see we are still growing.........happy to see that. Although just at a glance there seems to be a bit of disorganization lately.

Number of posts: 18700 Posts per day: 96.12
Number of topics: 689 Topics per day: 3.54
Number of users: 350 Users per day: 1.80
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm Made Aug 18

Number of posts: 26489 Posts per day: 110.56
Number of topics: 920 Topics per day: 3.84
Number of users: 421 Users per day: 1.76

October 2nd ............. board progress.

:D

Been awhile since an update but here it is:

Fri November 18th, 2005

Number of posts: 30271 Posts per day: 105.64
Number of topics: 1090 Topics per day: 3.80
Number of users: 529 Users per day: 1.85
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

[Gen. Sandworm]

Forum Statistics
Number of posts: 6990 Posts per day: 52.05
Number of topics: 267 Topics per day: 1.99
Number of users: 179 Users per day: 1.33
Board started: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:58 pm

Call it a State of the Union or whatever. Here are the current board stats. So please feel free to make suggestions. :D

Sat June 18th 2005
Just an update. As you can see for youself that the site is doing well. Please feel free to make more suggestions.

Forum Statistics
Number of posts