PDA

View Full Version : Political leaders condemn Islamic protest march



32Bravo
01-09-2010, 08:19 AM
Political leaders today widely condemned proposals by a controversial Islamic group to march through a town now synonymous with honouring soldiers killed in Afghanistan.


Downing Street and opposition leader David Cameron both criticised plans by Islam4UK to march through Wootton Bassett, Wiltshire, as "inappropriate" and "unacceptable".

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/political-leaders-condemn-islamic-protest-march-1857088.html

And this is the fella organising it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C73ePf_2KVw

32Bravo
01-10-2010, 05:44 AM
Wooton Bassett No 10 petition
<
<
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Wootten/

Rising Sun*
01-10-2010, 07:40 AM
I thought I'd posted one of my less temperate responses in this thread last night, but apparently I was so pissed then, or now, that I have no idea what I did.

Which is a pity as I was a lot more pissed last night and it had to be better than tonight’s modest and unusually restrained offering.


Mr Choudary said: "It is worth reminding those who are still not blinded by the media propaganda that Afghanistan is not a British Town near Wootton Basset (sic) but rather Muslim land which no one has the right to occupy…

Good point, Mr Choudary.

How about reminding arrogant Islamist ****wits like you that the Twin Towers were not Muslim land which no Muslims had the right to fly planes into? Ditto London Underground and buses; Madrid trains; Bali restaurants; and so on?


The procession in Wootton Basset is therefore an attempt to engage the British publics minds on the real reasons why their soldiers are returning home in body bags and the real cost of the war.

Well, Shit for Brains Choudary, the real reason their soldiers are returning home in body bags is because unreasoning homicidal religious ****wits like you embarked upon and continue to wage a spectacularly vicious, mindless and unwinnable ‘war’ against the West, yet you have no defined aims and no purpose beyond actions of absolutely no military or any other value in winning a war or any other conflict and which do no more than energise your enemy to crush you. Remember Pearl Harbor, you ****ing idiot?


The walk will not coincide with the return of a dead soldier's body, Mr Choudary added.

What a weak *****!

If he wants ‘to engage the public’s minds on the real reasons their soldiers are returning home in body bags’ he ought to have the courage of his convictions to draw the public’s attention to his cause when one of his enemy’s soldiers is returning home in a body bag.

If he and his food bandit supporters did that, I suspect that the good people of Wootton Bassett would at worst turn their backs on him and his useless primitive kind.

Unlike Mr ****ing Choudary and his medieval morons who, given half a chance and a box of matches, would be bombing the funeral procession; the local shops; the police station; the nearest army barracks; the parliament; and every other thing which distinguishes Mr ****ing Choudary and his bunch of murderous bearded seventh century apes from what passes for current civilisation.

I am so glad that I am not a Muslim.

Because if I was, then like so many Muslims of a decent and humane disposition, I would have to try to detach myself from arseholes like Mr Choudary who claim to speak for me and all other Muslims.

And nobody would believe me, because ****s like Mr Choudary have decided who is and is not a real Muslim and what a real Muslim must do, which apparently includes challenging and showing contempt for people who respect those soldiers who have died trying to rid the world of ****s like bin Laden who kill thousands of people just because they’re not like them and in a building targeted just because it’s there.

If those are the deeply thought out and highly intelligent principles Mr Choudary is so fond of, he should be grateful that instead of being in any Muslim country based on the Sharia law he espouses that he is lucky enough to live in a non-Islamic country where he can freely express his opposition to people who aren’t like him.

Then again, I rather like the idea of living in a country where, free of legal or social constraints, I can dispose of people like Mr Choudary because they aren’t anything like me or anyone I know and they want to blow me away.

One of which countries, oddly enough, happens to be Afghanistan.

Strange, isn’t it, that Mr Choudary the great demonstrator for Islamic causes chooses to live in and exercise his right to dissent in the hated West where those rights exist and are protected?

Which is the exact opposite of the Islamic countries he champions.

And where he carefully chooses not to live.

Is there a complicated paradox here beyond the ken of non-Islamic mortals like me, or are Choudary and his ilk just hypocritical ****wits who are no more than vipers in the breast of the nations which give them the liberty to rail against the West in favour of Islam when they would not have the reverse liberty in the systems of government they want to impose on the rest of the world?

Personally, I’m all for rounding the ****s up and shipping them to Islamic countries where they’ll be happy.

Or killed.

I really don’t care.

32Bravo
01-12-2010, 02:58 AM
Pity that you lost your original post. I suspect that I would have thoroughly enjoyed it.

Here's the latest on Mr Choudry

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/11/luton-guilty-soldiers-baby-killers

Rising Sun*
01-12-2010, 05:06 AM
Pity that you lost your original post. I suspect that I would have thoroughly enjoyed it.

Yes, it probably showed the unrestrained venom missing from the one I actually posted.



Here's the latest on Mr Choudry

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/11/luton-guilty-soldiers-baby-killers

I'm glad that Mr Choudry and his friends are opposed to murder and rape.

They are reprehensible crimes.

I assume that he is equally opposed to murder and rape by Muslims in what are laughably called 'honour killings'.

I may be missing something here as I am a decadent product of the West, but I don't see any honour in, for example, raping a woman before killing her for walking out of an unhappy arranged marriage http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-469553/Two-hour-rape-torture-honour-killing-girl-murdered-family.html or in imposing rape as a punishment for her younger brother associating with someone of a higher caste http://nowscape.com/islam/Pakistani_Rape_Victim.htm or killing a woman for being the victim of incestuous rape http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/08/honor-killing-in-jordan-muslim-shoots-his-16-year-old-niece-a-rape-victim-nine-times-in-the-head-and.html .

Maybe it's just me, but I think the rapists and murderers are the ones who should have been killed in those cases, not the poor bloody women.

And maybe that's part of why Mr Choudry and his medieval morons are so opposed to the West, because it threatens their belief that they can treat women as chattels and generally behave like the primitive arseholes they are.

So far as the alleged rapes and murders by British soldiers are concerned, even if they occurred I can't see how Mr Choudry et al have any grounds for being upset when it's perfectly alright for Muslim men to rape and murder their own women.

Or is that a privilege - sorry, punishment - reserved only for Muslim men with a particularly primitive disposition and extremely irrational conception of honour to impose upon women?

32Bravo
01-12-2010, 06:31 AM
These bastards really pissed me off:


Kriss, 15, was stabbed 13 times and then set on fire behind the Celtic Supporters Club on London Road, in the east end of the city...Evidence suggests Kriss made his way down towards the Clyde and tried to extinguish the flames by rolling around in a muddy hollow near the cycle path where he was discovered.
http://seanbryson.com/articles/kriss_donald_scotsman.html